Thank you so much on the UKS! I don't see the forest for the trees by now, with all the trying out.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto" class="gmail_attr">On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 1:27:30 PM UTC+2 Matthias Krack wrote:<br/></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0 0 0 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">





<div lang="en-CH" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="DE-CH">Hi Sam<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="DE-CH"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">it seems that you try to restart from an OT run with spin polarization (LSD/UKS ON) using an input in which LSD/UKS is set OFF or not set (the default is OFF), but it is not possible
 to change the spin-polarization on restart.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The OT run should have written the last converged (spin-polarized) wavefunction to the wfn restart file.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">And right, PERIODIC_EFIELD is only implement for OT.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">HTH<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Matthias<u></u><u></u></span></p></div></div><div lang="en-CH" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">"<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>" <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>> on behalf of Sam Broderick <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">wave...@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Reply to: </b>"<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>" <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Monday, 13 June 2022 at 12:24<br>
<b>To: </b>"<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>" <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[CP2K:17148] Re: Expert Advice needed: PERIODIC_EFIELD with metal nano-particle<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">The output from the production one (the global run is large show I include the end here:
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span style="font-family:"Courier New"">MD| ***************************************************************************<br>
 MD| Step number                                                            5104<br>
 MD| Time [fs]                                                       2552.000000<br>
 MD| Conserved quantity [hartree]                            -0.262582505304E+04<br>
 MD| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
 MD|                                          Instantaneous             Averages<br>
 MD| CPU time per MD step [s]                     26.061410            33.822750<br>
 MD| Energy drift per atom [K]           0.374503646625E+03   0.205283418423E+03<br>
 MD| Potential energy [hartree]         -0.262589862674E+04  -0.262592631376E+04<br>
 MD| Kinetic energy [hartree]            0.137757326096E+00   0.119719069562E+00<br>
 MD| Temperature [K]                             376.625724           327.309498<br>
 MD| ***************************************************************************<br>
<br>
 Spin 1<br>
<br>
 Number of electrons:                                                        435<br>
 Number of occupied orbitals:                                                435<br>
 Number of molecular orbitals:                                               435<br>
<br>
 Spin 2<br>
<br>
 Number of electrons:                                                        434<br>
 Number of occupied orbitals:                                                434<br>
 Number of molecular orbitals:                                               434<br>
<br>
 Number of orbital functions:                                               1975<br>
 Number of independent orbital functions:                                   1975<br>
<br>
 Extrapolation method: PS Nth order<br>
 Extrapolation order:  2<br>
<br>
<br>
 SCF WAVEFUNCTION OPTIMIZATION<br>
<br>
  ----------------------------------- OT ---------------------------------------<br>
  Minimizer      : DIIS                : direct inversion<br>
                                         in the iterative subspace<br>
                                         using   7 DIIS vectors<br>
                                         safer DIIS on<br>
  Preconditioner : FULL_SINGLE_INVERSE : inversion of <br>
                                         H + eS - 2*(Sc)(c^T*H*c+const)(Sc)^T<br>
  Precond_solver : DEFAULT<br>
  stepsize       :    0.08000000                  energy_gap     :    0.08000000<br>
  ortho_irac     : CHOL                           irac_degree    :             4<br>
  max_irac       :            50                  eps_irac       :   0.10000E-09<br>
  eps_irac_switch:   0.10000E-01                  eps_irac_quick_exit: 0.100E-04<br>
  on_the_fly_loc : F<br>
  ----------------------------------- OT ---------------------------------------<br>
<br>
  Step     Update method      Time    Convergence         Total energy    Change<br>
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
     1 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.6     0.00000775     -2625.8983262879 -2.63E+03<br>
     2 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000405     -2625.8983310938 -4.81E-06<br>
     3 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000353     -2625.8983328495 -1.76E-06<br>
     4 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000334     -2625.8983350122 -2.16E-06<br>
     5 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.8     0.00000315     -2625.8983386726 -3.66E-06<br>
     6 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000296     -2625.8983443709 -5.70E-06<br>
     7 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000269     -2625.8983545672 -1.02E-05<br>
     8 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000249     -2625.8983637011 -9.13E-06<br>
     9 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000233     -2625.8983715220 -7.82E-06<br>
    10 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000220     -2625.8983782333 -6.71E-06<br>
    11 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.8     0.00000210     -2625.8983844367 -6.20E-06<br>
    12 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000203     -2625.8983895822 -5.15E-06<br>
    13 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000197     -2625.8983941766 -4.59E-06<br>
    14 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000191     -2625.8983986569 -4.48E-06<br>
    15 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000185     -2625.8984037404 -5.08E-06<br>
    16 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000178     -2625.8984097126 -5.97E-06<br>
    17 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000166     -2625.8984185968 -8.88E-06<br>
    18 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.6     0.00000154     -2625.8984272390 -8.64E-06<br>
    19 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000142     -2625.8984357725 -8.53E-06<br>
    20 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000130     -2625.8984426842 -6.91E-06<br>
    21 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000121     -2625.8984475524 -4.87E-06<br>
    22 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000113     -2625.8984512475 -3.70E-06<br>
    23 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000106     -2625.8984545255 -3.28E-06<br>
    24 OT DIIS     0.80E-01    1.7     0.00000099     -2625.8984573944 -2.87E-06<br>
<br>
 *** SCF run terminated - exceeded requested execution time:   86340.000 seconds.<br>
<br>
 *** Execution time now:    86340.037 seconds.<br>
<br>
  *** SCF run converged in    24 steps ***<br>
<br>
<br>
  Electronic density on regular grids:       -869.0000000000        0.0000000000<br>
  Core density on regular grids:              868.9999999985       -0.0000000015<br>
  Total charge density on r-space grids:       -0.0000000014<br>
  Total charge density g-space grids:          -0.0000000014<br>
<br>
  Overlap energy of the core charge distribution:               0.00000146582976<br>
  Self energy of the core charge distribution:              -4570.41375350254566<br>
  Core Hamiltonian energy:                                   1458.28031159567945<br>
  Hartree energy:                                             899.55026105138484<br>
  Exchange-correlation energy:                               -412.42098926839282<br>
  Dispersion energy:                                           -0.89428873636523<br>
<br>
  Total energy:                                             -2625.89845739440943<br>
<br>
  outer SCF iter =    1 RMS gradient =   0.99E-06 energy =      -2625.8984573944<br>
  outer SCF loop converged in   1 iterations or   24 steps<br>
<br>
<br>
 ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy [a.u.]:            -2625.898460009454993<br>
<br>
 *** MD run terminated - exceeded requested execution time:   86340.000 seconds.<br>
<br>
 *** Execution time now:    86343.048 seconds.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 12:19:20 PM UTC+2 Sam Broderick wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">An additional question: after a global run, where the last step did not converge within the WALLTIME I set in the input:
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span style="font-family:"Courier New""> *** SCF run terminated - exceeded requested execution time:   86340.000 seconds.<br>
<br>
 *** Execution time now:    86340.037 seconds.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">What is stored in the restart data? The last converged MD step or the one that did not converge? Could this be why I get this error when I try to start a production run form this? Sorry for the newbie questions.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Courier New"">READ RESTART : WARNING : nspin is not equal
<br>
<br>
 *******************************************************************************<br>
 *   ___                                                                       *<br>
 *  /   \                                                                      *<br>
 * [ABORT]                                                                     *<br>
 *  \___/                     Reducing nspin is not possible.                  *<br>
 *    |                                                                        *<br>
 *  O/|                                                                        *<br>
 * /| |                                                                        *<br>
 * / \                                                          qs_mo_io.F:708 *<br>
 *******************************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
 ===== Routine Calling Stack ===== <br>
<br>
            8 read_mo_set_from_restart<br>
            7 calculate_first_density_matrix<br>
            6 scf_env_initial_rho_setup<br>
            5 init_scf_run<br>
            4 qs_energies<br>
            3 qs_forces<br>
            2 qs_mol_dyn_low<br>
            1 CP2K</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 11:42:26 AM UTC+2 Sam Broderick wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Dear cp2k aficionados, <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">It seems to me that I have run into a strong limitation of cp2k, but I am not know enough to anything close to sure. My goal: determine spectroscopic response of an organic molecule near a metal nano-particle.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">On the one hand, &DIAGONALIZATION is strongly recommended for metals. On the other hand, TRAVIS requires &PERIODIC_EFIELD to determine the polarizability, but this means &OT. I am having severe difficulties with
 the production run with a thermostat.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Is cp2k the right tool or am I just not doing it right (e.g., something better than DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH and GTH-PBE-q)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Would you please have a look at my .inp and provide me with some tips? My boss is quite dissatisfied with node hour usage while I try to figure this out.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Many, many thanks<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Sam<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div></div><div lang="en-CH" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">-- <br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/1cb69247-862f-4dba-85a8-4953bed216e9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/1cb69247-862f-4dba-85a8-4953bed216e9n%2540googlegroups.com?utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&source=gmail&ust=1655209486256000&usg=AOvVaw0OQPE2bKZxzYcMwQpy95jx">
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/1cb69247-862f-4dba-85a8-4953bed216e9n%40googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>

</blockquote></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/cfd93daa-8fc6-4c4e-aa5a-bad25d5560a5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/cfd93daa-8fc6-4c4e-aa5a-bad25d5560a5n%40googlegroups.com</a>.<br />