<div>Hi Matthias,</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for your reply. The inconsistency disappears when I disable 
<span>LONG_RANGE_CORRECTION</span>.</div><div><br></div><div>Kind regards,</div><div>Severin<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto" class="gmail_attr">Matthias Krack schrieb am Montag, 12. April 2021 um 19:50:17 UTC+2:<br/></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0 0 0 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">





<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Hi Severin<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Do you observe the same behavior with LONG_RANGE_CORRECTION disabled?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Best regards<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Matthias<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="DE" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt"></div></div></div><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="DE" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Von:</span></b><span lang="DE" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">c...@googlegroups.com</a> <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">c...@googlegroups.com</a>>
<b>Im Auftrag von </b>Severin Sylla<br>
<b>Gesendet:</b> Montag, 12. April 2021 17:28<br>
<b>An:</b> <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">c...@googlegroups.com</a><br>
<b>Betreff:</b> [CP2K:15117] inconsistent analytical stress tensor in cp2k mpi runs<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear cp2k community,<br>
<br>
I am calculating the analytical stress tensor of a cubic diamond 3x3x3 supercell using the popt/psmp version of cp2k.<br>
I observe that the diagonal elements of the analytical stress tensor depend on the number of mpi processes. Only when running cp2k with one single mpi task, the analytical stress tensor roughly agrees with the numerical one.<br>
I encountered this issue with cp2k 8.1 + openmpi 4.0 (compiled with gcc 9.2), and also with intel mpi 2018.3 (intel compiler suite 18.0).<br>
<br>
Any suggestions on how to fix/avoid this inconsistency would be appreciated. Thanks!<br>
<br>
In the attachment, you can find the input file, an example of an output file, and the computed diagonal elements of the stress tensor for different number of mpi processes. The problem does not affect the off-diagonal entries.<br>
<br>
Kind Regards,<br>
Severin<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div></div><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt"><p class="MsoNormal">-- <br></p></div></div></div><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt"><p class="MsoNormal">
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAOkt55U2ey15yqevddgs2MmHntQC7pVKisce5zzxkMsVK3hErA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=de&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAOkt55U2ey15yqevddgs2MmHntQC7pVKisce5zzxkMsVK3hErA%2540mail.gmail.com?utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&source=gmail&ust=1618387676516000&usg=AFQjCNHlgNahPearZYp8VkOUEbS1OBbD2A">
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAOkt55U2ey15yqevddgs2MmHntQC7pVKisce5zzxkMsVK3hErA%40mail.gmail.com</a>.<u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></blockquote></div>