<div dir="ltr"><font face="georgia, serif">Hi jgh,</font><div><font face="georgia, serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif">In a QMMM calculation, does the potent<font color="#000000">ial added to the QM part according to </font></font><font color="#000000">FORCE_EVAL / DFT / <font face="georgia, serif">EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL </font><font face="georgia, serif" style="">will also be added to the MM region ? </font></font></div><div><font color="#000000"><font face="georgia, serif" style=""><br></font></font></div><div><span style="font-family: georgia, serif;">If I activate both part simultaneously, does it cause any programming problem or double counting in a QMMM calculation ?</span><font color="#000000"><font face="georgia, serif" style=""><br></font></font></div><div><font face="georgia, serif"><font color="#000000"><br></font></font><br>在 2019年11月18日星期一 UTC+8下午5:34:10,jgh写道:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">Hi
<br>
<br>CP2K_INPUT / FORCE_EVAL / EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL
<br>-> define potential acting ON atoms (force field type)
<br>
<br>CP2K_INPUT / FORCE_EVAL / DFT / EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL.
<br>-> define external potential using atomic positions and acting
<br>   on total charge distribution (electrons + nuclei)
<br>
<br>regards
<br>
<br>Juerg Hutter
<br>
<br>------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>--
<br>Juerg Hutter                         Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
<br>Institut für Chemie C                FAX   : ++41 44 635 6838
<br>Universität Zürich                   E-mail: <a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="Ae5Uj39OBQAJ" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='javascript:';return true;" onclick="this.href='javascript:';return true;">h...@chem.uzh.ch</a>
<br>Winterthurerstrasse 190
<br>CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
<br>------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>---
<br>
<br>-----<a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="Ae5Uj39OBQAJ" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='javascript:';return true;" onclick="this.href='javascript:';return true;">c...@googlegroups.com</a> wrote: -----
<br>To: "cp2k" <<a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="Ae5Uj39OBQAJ" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='javascript:';return true;" onclick="this.href='javascript:';return true;">c...@googlegroups.com</a>>
<br>From: "Ke Zhou" 
<br>Sent by: <a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="Ae5Uj39OBQAJ" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='javascript:';return true;" onclick="this.href='javascript:';return true;">c...@googlegroups.com</a>
<br>Date: 11/15/2019 09:34AM
<br>Subject: [CP2K:12497] Questions About EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL
<br>
<br>Dear All, 
<br>
<br>Now I am trying to simulate water confined by 2 virtual walls that using Morse potential to enforce the interaction from wall to the cores of H2O. The extra force from walls is as a function of the O-wall distance (no extra force on H).
<br>Here is one of works that implements this method.  <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02183" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='https://www.google.com/url?q\x3dhttps%3A%2F%2Fpubs.acs.org%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1021%2Facs.jpclett.8b02183\x26sa\x3dD\x26sntz\x3d1\x26usg\x3dAFQjCNGLBE53CiGqyb7kT4Q6-7pK1B-aPA';return true;" onclick="this.href='https://www.google.com/url?q\x3dhttps%3A%2F%2Fpubs.acs.org%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1021%2Facs.jpclett.8b02183\x26sa\x3dD\x26sntz\x3d1\x26usg\x3dAFQjCNGLBE53CiGqyb7kT4Q6-7pK1B-aPA';return true;">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/<wbr>10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02183</a>
<br>
<br>Here, I find two sections that can apply external potential. The one is CP2K_INPUT / FORCE_EVAL / EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL. The another is  CP2K_INPUT / FORCE_EVAL / DFT / EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL.
<br>
<br>Here I have 2 questions:
<br>(1) What is the difference of these two sections? 
<br>(2) The second method can not specify the atoms on which the external potential will act (while the first method can by ATOMS_LIST). Can I specify the atoms by second method?
<br>(3) If both is OK. Which one is better for this question?
<br>
<br>Best,
<br>Justin 
<br>
<br>  
<br>  -- 
<br> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
<br> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="Ae5Uj39OBQAJ" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='javascript:';return true;" onclick="this.href='javascript:';return true;">cp...@googlegroups.<wbr>com</a>.
<br> To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/04593785-cb90-4aef-8bd2-5efc113b0d78%40googlegroups.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmousedown="this.href='https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/04593785-cb90-4aef-8bd2-5efc113b0d78%40googlegroups.com';return true;" onclick="this.href='https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/04593785-cb90-4aef-8bd2-5efc113b0d78%40googlegroups.com';return true;">https://groups.google.com/d/<wbr>msgid/cp2k/04593785-cb90-4aef-<wbr>8bd2-5efc113b0d78%<wbr>40googlegroups.com</a>.
<br> 
<br></blockquote></div></div>