<div dir="ltr"><div>Hello, anybody home?</div><div><br></div><div>Is there nobody to explain the keywords of the inputs?<br><br>2017년 6월 29일 목요일 오후 3시 4분 37초 UTC+9, Chris K. Lee 님의 말:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;"><div dir="ltr"><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Dear CP2K users,</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">I have some questions in the NEB example.</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">(</span><a onmousedown="this.href='https://www.google.com/url?q\x3dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.cp2k.org%2Fexercises%3A2015_cecam_tutorial%3Aneb\x26sa\x3dD\x26sntz\x3d1\x26usg\x3dAFQjCNFQF3OZcESYjZDkqfM-5WdTW0U2Pw';return true;" onclick="this.href='https://www.google.com/url?q\x3dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.cp2k.org%2Fexercises%3A2015_cecam_tutorial%3Aneb\x26sa\x3dD\x26sntz\x3d1\x26usg\x3dAFQjCNFQF3OZcESYjZDkqfM-5WdTW0U2Pw';return true;" href="https://www.cp2k.org/exercises:2015_cecam_tutorial:neb" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><u><span lang="EN-US" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); letter-spacing: 0pt;">https://www.cp2k.org/<wbr>exercises:2015_cecam_tutorial:<wbr>neb</span></u></a><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">)</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">It’s so hard to understand only with the Input reference.</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">(</span><a onmousedown="this.href='https://www.google.com/url?q\x3dhttps%3A%2F%2Fmanual.cp2k.org%2F\x26sa\x3dD\x26sntz\x3d1\x26usg\x3dAFQjCNGQMudCiNhSvGr5ysmyuZ-W15xMZA';return true;" onclick="this.href='https://www.google.com/url?q\x3dhttps%3A%2F%2Fmanual.cp2k.org%2F\x26sa\x3dD\x26sntz\x3d1\x26usg\x3dAFQjCNGQMudCiNhSvGr5ysmyuZ-W15xMZA';return true;" href="https://manual.cp2k.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><u><span lang="EN-US" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); letter-spacing: 0pt;">https://manual.cp2k.org</span></u></a><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">)</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">At ./NEB/EX2/neb_GPW.inp</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">1. line 2</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">&MULTIPLE_FORCE_EVALS</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">FORCE_EVAL_ORDER 2 3</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">“FORCE_EVAL_ORDER {Integer} ...” : Specify the orders of the different force_eval.</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">What does ‘orders’ mean? What I guess for ‘2 3’ is </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">There are three FORCE_EVAL sections and 1st one only contains the information.</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">The 2nd and 3rd ones act as usual ‘FORCE_EVAL’. Am I right?</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">2. line 9</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">&FORCE_EVAL / &MIXED</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">GROUP_PARTITION 2 16 </span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">“GROUP_PARTITION {Integer} ...” : gives the exact number of processors for each group</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Is this mean that using 2 cpu processors for the 2nd FORCE_EVAL and 16 for the 3rd one?</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">At ./NEB/EX2/neb.inp ‘GROUP_PARTITION 1 1’ means it only use total 2 processors?</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">3. line 12, 13</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">&FORCE_EVAL / &MIXED / &GENERIC</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">MIXING_FUNCTION E1+E2</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">VARIABLES E1 E2</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">What does these two terms mean and how it works?</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Is this ‘VARIABLES’ only for energy?</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Does the CP2K understands that the variables as energy of 2nd and 3rd FORCE_EVAL?</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Which energy would be printed on the output?</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">4. line 24, 27</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">&FORCE_EVAL / &MIXED / &MAPPING</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">&FORCE_EVAL 1 , &FORCE_EVAL 2</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Does it mean that the 2nd FORCE_EVAL would treated as ‘1’ and the 3rd one as ‘2’ ?</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">5. line 33</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">&FORCE_EVAL / &SUBSYS</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">&COLVAR</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Does this ‘COLVAR’ make automatically its own output without PRINT options?</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">6. line 72</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">&FORCE_EVAL / &MM / &FORCEFIELD / &NONBONDED / &GENPOT</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">atoms Cu C</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">FUNCTION A*exp(-av*r)+B*exp(-ac*r)-C/(<wbr>r^6)</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">VARIABLES r</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">“VARIABLES {Word} ... “ : Defines the variable of the functional form.</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">It shows they are trying to use ‘r’ as variable but that’s all.</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Does CP2K understand that ‘r’ as distance between Cu and C?</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Only the distance should be the ‘variables’ here?</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">7. line 213</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">&MOTION / &BAND</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US">  </span><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">NPROC_REP 18</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">Is this option useless for the serial run like ssmp?</span></p><p><span>     </span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">8. REPLICAs</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">What I under stand is that they used the intermediate coordinates as replica.</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">They already optimized geometry for starting materials and final products.</span></p><p style="letter-spacing: 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="letter-spacing: 0pt;">How they get the optimized intermediate coordinates of the replica?</span></p><p><span>     </span></p></div></blockquote></div>