<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "> Ciao Nick,<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>Looks like it is a problem with the new real-space distirbution.. can you try </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>the realspace distribution -> replicated ?</div><div>Does it work?</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>In case I guess people working on that need an input file (even a fake one) reproducing the same error to debug the problem..</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>Thanks Nick!</div><div>teo</div><div><br><div><div>On 29 Feb 2008, at 21:23, Nichols A. Romero wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">Hi,<br><br>We are working on a very large system size ~ 4000 atoms. It is finite system and<br>there is about 20 Bohr of vacuum on all sides. (Probably overkill).<br><br>I think the error that I am receiving has to do with the parallel distribution of<br> the data. Would the distribution algorithm fail if there is too much vacuum perhaps?<br><br>Here is the error message. BTW, we seem to be able to run the 4096 & 8196 test<br>cases.<br><br><p><br><font face="Courier New" size="2"> Extrapolation method: initial_guess</font> </p> <br><p><font face="Courier New" size="2"> *</font> <br><font face="Courier New" size="2"> *** ERROR in pack_matrix almost there ***</font> <br><font face="Courier New" size="2"> *</font> </p> <br><p><font face="Courier New" size="2"> *** Matrix block not found ***</font> </p><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Nichols A. Romero, Ph.D.<br>DoD User Productivity Enhancement and Technology Transfer (PET) Group<br>High Performance Technologies, Inc.<br>Reston, VA<br>443-567-8328 (C)<br>410-278-2692 (O)<br> <br> <br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>