<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "> you should use a smaller epsilon to get the same accuracy.. but what really puzzles me is that you get<div>out of memory for the splines.. you should get very few splines and I can't understand how you get out of memory </div><div>(unless you're not using a commodore 64) ;-))).. that's why I thought it could be a bug...</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>teo</div><div><div><br><div><div>On 29 Nov 2007, at 11:42, Axel wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">epsilon to a much smaller to get the same accuracy than without?</font></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">or would the default epsilon still be sufficient?</font></p> </blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>