[CP2K-user] [CP2K:22165] Re: Optimization inputs PDOS with HSE06 level of theory and AI-MD
Lorenzo Lagasco
lagascolorenzo at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 10:14:24 UTC 2026
Good morning,
my bad, I've now attached both input and output files (with final timing
report). In this case, I repeated the calculation using 2 nodes with 40
processors each.
Thanks for your patience.
Best regards
Lorenzo Lagasco
Il giorno lun 6 apr 2026 alle ore 11:24 Marcella Iannuzzi <
marci.akira at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hi,
>
> As Frederick mentioned, for a proper analysis one would need the timing
> report at the end of the output.
> You could speed up the calculation by increasing EPS_DEFAULT (10^-10)
> I would also set CALCULATE_C9_TERM to false.
> Kind regards
> Marcella
>
> On Monday, April 6, 2026 at 8:42:29 AM UTC+2 lagasco... at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Good evening,
>> here attached input and output of my ai-md calculation. In this case, 4
>> nodes with 16 processors have been used (the ones with 52 priocessors are
>> non available at the moment). Moreover, I'm using the version 2025.1 on a
>> cluster (CPU model name Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz).
>>
>> Best regards
>> Lorenzo Lagasco
>>
>> Il giorno sab 4 apr 2026 alle ore 20:38 Frederick Stein <f.s... at hzdr.de>
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>> Dear Lorenzo,
>>> Sorry, I forgot about your second question. Others may correct me if
>>> necessary. I can only guess. Can you run 2-3 MD steps and send us the
>>> timing report at the end of the CP2K output file? Do you run with 52 cores
>>> or do you use less? What hardware are you running on and which software
>>> stack do you use? Which version of CP2K are you talking about?
>>> Usually, standard-DFT-calculations are most performant if the number of
>>> MPI ranks is a square number and you use at most 2 OpenMP threads per MPI
>>> rank.
>>> Best,
>>> Frederick
>>>
>>> Lorenzo Lagasco schrieb am Samstag, 4. April 2026 um 19:25:02 UTC+2:
>>>
>>>> Good afternoon,
>>>> thanks for the information! In the meantime, I’d like to take the
>>>> opportunity to ask if you also have any advice regarding my second
>>>> question.
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Lorenzo Lagasco
>>>>
>>>> Il giorno sab 4 apr 2026 alle ore 11:18 Frederick Stein <f.s... at hzdr.de>
>>>> ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Lorenzo,
>>>>> It is highly recommended to perform hybrid calculations using the ADMM
>>>>> approach (
>>>>> https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/DFT/AUXILIARY_DENSITY_MATRIX_METHOD.html
>>>>> and https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/methods/dft/hartree-fock/admm.html).
>>>>> You will need to choose suitable fitting basis sets (BASIS AUX_FIT <basis
>>>>> set name>) in the respective kind sections usually from BASIS_ADMM or
>>>>> BASIS_ADMM_UZH. This should accelerate your calculations significantly.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Frederick
>>>>>
>>>>> Lorenzo Lagasco schrieb am Freitag, 3. April 2026 um 06:19:22 UTC+2:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>> I'm a new cp2k user and I have a couple of questions, not strictly
>>>>>> related to each other:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. I have written an input file for a band structure calculation
>>>>>> of a system consisting of delafossite CuAlO₂ with an organic dye (coumarin
>>>>>> 343) anchored on its surface, using the HSE06 level of theory. However, the
>>>>>> calculation appears to be unusually slow (using 4 nodes with 52 processors
>>>>>> each, after about 2 hours it has not even completed the first SCF step). I
>>>>>> would like to ask whether it would be possible to get feedback on how to
>>>>>> optimize the input file, or if there might be some incorrectly set
>>>>>> parameters. I have attached both the input file and the xyz file of the
>>>>>> system geometry.
>>>>>> 2. At the same time, I am working on NVT CP2K dynamics at the
>>>>>> PBE+D3 level of theory for aluminosilicate nanosheets in water of different
>>>>>> sizes (the simulation box ranges from about 719 to 900 atoms). Currently,
>>>>>> the simulations proceed at a speed of about 25 seconds per MD step (using 1
>>>>>> node with 52 processors for each simulation). Since I need a trajectory of
>>>>>> 60 ps with a timestep of 0.5 fs, I would like to ask whether it is possible
>>>>>> to improve the computational performance. I am also attaching the input
>>>>>> file in this case md-GPW.inp
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the help!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/7634d177-82ae-445f-aa43-9068ad1d9392n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/7634d177-82ae-445f-aa43-9068ad1d9392n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
>>>
>> To view this discussion visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/fc2e811b-1ae9-4572-a3d2-1c1e14a2d046n%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/fc2e811b-1ae9-4572-a3d2-1c1e14a2d046n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/37acddf8-506b-4a3b-a4cd-e2fa03010058n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/37acddf8-506b-4a3b-a4cd-e2fa03010058n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAKRVyRtjwAXnXQDcFVxQPGg4u0HP9mjob1F7%3DLnvFASidsEizw%40mail.gmail.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20260406/cd0c8e7e/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: md-GPW.inp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 65079 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20260406/cd0c8e7e/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: output-md.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 84696 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20260406/cd0c8e7e/attachment-0003.obj>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list