[CP2K-user] [CP2K:21309] MoS2 in CP2K and CPMD: identical models give different results
Fominykh Nikita
nikfominyh at gmail.com
Fri Mar 28 17:13:12 UTC 2025
Dear colleagues,
I am comparing the MoS2 model with the PBE xc-functional in CP2K and CPMD
with the same GTH pseudopotential. I have found some strange discrepancies.
For comparison, I calculate energy differences while changing the lattice
constant in the xy-plane (compression and tension). In these tests I use
Gamma point only. Please see 3 plots with the Energy-vs-Strain attached.
1) First, let us consider the bulk MoS2 in the 2H structure. CP2K and CPMD
with the same GTH pseudopotential give different results. Other CPMD
calculations with the ‘CPMD-native’ GTH model and the CPMD MT
pseudopotential give similar results to CPMD-withGTHcp2k. Interestingly,
VASP results are very close to CP2K.
In order to decipher the puzzle, I have made calculations for pure Mo and
for pure S.
2) For the bcc Mo structure all the codes with different pseudopotentials
give very close results.
3) However, for the S6 structure of sulphur, the CPMD-withGTHcp2k and
CPMD-withMT results agree well with VASP, but do not match CP2K. And the
CPMD results for its ‘native’ GTH model show a significant offset.
I also tried changing energy cutoffs, enabling various k-meshes, and
enlarging the cell, however I couldn’t find the possible reasons for these
discrepancies in CP2K and CPMD with the same GTH pseudopotential of MoS2
and for S6.
There are example files for these comparisons attached.
Please let me know your best judgement about the possible roots of these
discrepancies.
Best regards,
Nikita
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/79e3b838-3ca5-4f31-a606-dbf12dec50cen%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250328/1a66a9f5/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: S6.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 71865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250328/1a66a9f5/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: MoS2.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 75135 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250328/1a66a9f5/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bccMo.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 62501 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250328/1a66a9f5/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: input.zip
Type: application/x-zip
Size: 87285 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250328/1a66a9f5/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list