[CP2K-user] [CP2K:21049] Differences Between Mulliken and Hirshfeld Charge Analysis

Thomas Kühne tkuehne at gmail.com
Thu Jan 16 15:09:05 UTC 2025


Dear Kha Trinh, 

the results of population analyses such as Mulliken population analysis and charge analyses such as Hirscheld and DDEC charges are 
not unique and may severely differ - in some cases even within the sign! As such the differences you observe are within what to expect. 

Best regards, 
Thomas Kühne

> Am 14.01.2025 um 02:21 schrieb Kha Trinh <minhkha010301 at gmail.com>:
> 
> Dear CP2K Users,
> 
> I’m working on the geometry optimization of a transition state featuring an O--Li--O structure using CP2K and ASE. As part of the analysis, I calculated Mulliken and Hirshfeld charges, but I noticed significant discrepancies between the two methods.
> 
> Here are the results for two cases of the transition state:
> 
> Mulliken Charges:
> 
> Oxygen (O): -0.361
> 
> Lithium (Li): 0.565
> 
> Oxygen (O): -0.367
> 
> Hirshfeld Charges
> 
> Oxygen (O): -0.261
> 
> Lithium (Li): -0.470
> 
> Oxygen (O): -0.265
> 
> The results from Mulliken and Hirshfeld methods show opposite trends regarding the charge on the Li atom. The Hirshfeld analysis, in particular, seems counterintuitive because I would expect lithium, located between two oxygen atoms, to have a partially positive charge. However, in my field, it is more common to report Mulliken charges.
> 
> Could this discrepancy arise from the charge partitioning methods or my calculation settings? My system includes C, H, O, N, and Li atoms, using the DZVP-GTH basis set and GTH-PBE functional. Any advice on interpreting or validating these results would be greatly appreciated. I have attached the relevant input and output files for reference. 
> 
> Thank you so much in advance
> 
> Best regards,
> Kha
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com <mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/3417dede-bb67-46a0-85ff-91a941b8dc81n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/3417dede-bb67-46a0-85ff-91a941b8dc81n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> <last_frame.xyz><PROJECT-hirshfeld_charges.hirshfeld><geo_opt.py><PROJECT-mulliken_charges.mulliken>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/350CBAA8-95F2-4E08-84B4-4358DF04D56C%40gmail.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250116/1de69759/attachment.htm>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list