[CP2K-user] [CP2K:21153] Graphene nano stripe (GNS) optimisation
Giuseppe Zollo
1saqquara at gmail.com
Thu Feb 13 22:16:15 UTC 2025
Dear all of the staff.
Thank you for your help. I've figured out the problem. It was caused by
linking against MKL libraries (I really don't know why: they behave quite
well and reliably for QE and SIESTA, f.i.).
Now linking against AMD linear algebra libraries everything goes well: the
usage of complex wfc does not crash and a quick convergence is attained
together with the correct stable structure that is extremely close to the
one obtained with plane waves.
I write also to warn people about this problem that might possibly occur in
AMD based HPCs.
Thanks again
Giuseppe
Il giorno giovedì 13 febbraio 2025 alle 12:24:25 UTC+1 Giuseppe Zollo ha
scritto:
> Thanks. I've tried right now to export OMP_STACKSIZE up to 1GB and it
> continues to crush
>
> Il giorno giovedì 13 febbraio 2025 alle 11:59:53 UTC+1 Krack Matthias ha
> scritto:
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> Did you already try to increase the OMP_STACKSIZE (e.g. export
> OMP_STACKSIZE=64MB)? Your original output shows that you are using the
> default size which might be too small.
>
>
>
> HTH
>
>
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *cp... at googlegroups.com <cp... at googlegroups.com> on behalf of
> Giuseppe Zollo <1saq... at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 13 February 2025 at 11:16
> *To: *cp2k <cp... at googlegroups.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [CP2K:21143] Graphene nano stripe (GNS) optimisation
>
> Hello,
>
> thank you so much for your time.
>
> Unfortunately setting the wavefunctions to REAL was the only way to make
> the simulation proceed. Indeed if a do not include this flag (so as to
> assume complex wavefunctions) the simulation hangs, as reported here, at
> the initials of the first SCF loop and the run crashes.
>
> I'm using quite a lot memory so I assume that should not be a memory
> problem, should it be?
>
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************
>
> Iteration Convergence
> Energy [au]
>
>
> *******************************************************************************
>
> 1 0.240530
> -6.658276883875
>
> 2 0.153299
> -6.681113186074
>
> 3 0.339530E-02
> -6.698173661406
>
> 4 0.134821E-03
> -6.698181647940
>
> 5 0.672005E-06
> -6.698181660696
>
>
>
> Energy components [Hartree] Total Energy ::
> -6.698181660696
>
> Band Energy ::
> -1.311151959578
>
> Kinetic Energy ::
> 3.482441966707
>
> Potential Energy ::
> -10.180623627403
>
> Virial (-V/T) ::
> 2.923415156586
>
> Core Energy ::
> -8.233425335600
>
> XC Energy ::
> -2.899318720305
>
> Coulomb Energy ::
> 4.434562395209
>
> Total Pseudopotential Energy ::
> -11.749206534330
>
> Local Pseudopotential Energy ::
> -12.352996294377
>
> Nonlocal Pseudopotential Energy ::
> 0.603789760047
>
> Confinement ::
> 0.333392320232
>
>
>
> Orbital energies State L Occupation Energy[a.u.]
> Energy[eV]
>
>
>
> 1 0 2.000 -0.483136
> -13.146798
>
>
>
> 1 1 2.000 -0.172440
> -4.692332
>
>
>
>
>
> Total Electron Density at R=0:
> 4.671964
>
> Re-scaling the density matrix to get the right number of electrons
>
> # Electrons Trace(P) Scaling
> factor
>
> 252 252.000
> 1.000
>
>
>
>
>
> SCF WAVEFUNCTION OPTIMIZATION
>
>
>
> Step Update method Time Convergence Total energy
> Change
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Il giorno giovedì 13 febbraio 2025 alle 10:44:01 UTC+1 Jürg Hutter ha
> scritto:
>
> Hi
> I don't have time to look closer into your problem but a quick inspection
> of the input file shows a major problem in your definition for the
> k-points.
> The Wavefunction REAL option should not be used in you case, as the
> correct
> WFN for a MP Grid of 1 1 8 will have complex wavefunctions.
> regards
> JH
>
> ________________________________________
> From: cp... at googlegroups.com <cp... at googlegroups.com> on behalf of
> Giuseppe Zollo <1saq... at gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 12:15 PM
> To: cp2k
> Subject: [CP2K:21135] Graphene nano stripe (GNS) optimisation
>
> Dear All,
> I've been working for long time with QE.
> Now I'm trying to get some results with CP2K (I'm new of this nice code).
> A problem seems to arise for an edge patterned GNS I'm interested in. I
> hope to get some results with hybrid functionals that is very hard to
> obtain with plane waves as the unit cell is large.
> I get easy convergence only by using kpoints (no other attempt has been
> successful) and full periodic system (partial periodicity does not converge
> and system without kpoints and two unit cells along the stripe does not
> converge as well).
> But the point Is that the structure, that I know is stable from plane
> waves QE calculations, is completely destroyed after few optimisation
> steps.
> Maybe I'm missing something.
> Here I attach input, output and optimisation coordinates
> Any help will be appreciated,
> Regards
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com>.
>
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b438d7f7-fb8c-4ad3-a726-d58efc7b27f7n%40googlegroups.com
> <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b438d7f7-fb8c-4ad3-a726-d58efc7b27f7n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/659f0b75-58e3-4aa0-9107-1e74a0f044b4n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/659f0b75-58e3-4aa0-9107-1e74a0f044b4n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b2517afb-a7c5-42e3-8d51-51920f3f3fecn%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250213/5d1eceae/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list