[CP2K-user] [CP2K:21771] Re: Mismatch between CP2K computed Force constant (a.u)and Gaussian computed force constant(mDyne/angstrom)
Naina Sethi
sethinaina336 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 23 15:17:05 UTC 2025
The frequencies and the reduced masses are very similar in both Gaussian
and CP2K.(probably because both of them report in the same units).
I've included for you the CP2k input for frequency cal.
&GLOBAL
PROJECT H2O
RUN_TYPE VIBRATIONAL_ANALYSIS
PRINT_LEVEL MEDIUM
&END GLOBAL
&FORCE_EVAL
METHOD QS
&DFT
BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME BASIS_MOLOPT
POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME GTH_POTENTIALS
CHARGE 0
MULTIPLICITY 1
&PRINT
&MOMENTS
&END
&END
&MGRID
CUTOFF 300
NGRIDS 5
REL_CUTOFF 70
&END MGRID
&QS
EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-12
WF_INTERPOLATION ASPC
&END QS
&SCF
SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
EPS_SCF 1.0E-7
MAX_SCF 1000
CHOLESKY INVERSE
ADDED_MOS 50
&DIAGONALIZATION
ALGORITHM STANDARD
&END DIAGONALIZATION
&MIXING
METHOD BROYDEN_MIXING
ALPHA 0.4
NBROYDEN 8
&END MIXING
&END SCF
&XC
&XC_FUNCTIONAL
&PBE
&END PBE
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&vdW_POTENTIAL
DISPERSION_FUNCTIONAL PAIR_POTENTIAL
&PAIR_POTENTIAL
PARAMETER_FILE_NAME dftd3.dat
TYPE DFTD3
REFERENCE_FUNCTIONAL PBE
R_CUTOFF 15.0
&END PAIR_POTENTIAL
&END vdW_POTENTIAL
&END XC
&POISSON
PERIODIC xyz
POISSON_SOLVER WAVELET
&END POISSON
&END DFT
&SUBSYS
&CELL
ABC 20.0000 20.0000 20.0000
ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.0 90.0 90.0
PERIODIC xyz
&END CELL
&COORD
O -0.762288846626 0.000000000001 -1.462238785752
H -0.762288846634 0.759337000000 -0.866195785751
H -0.762288846634 -0.759337000000 -0.866195785753
&END COORD
&KIND Mg
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q10
&END KIND
&KIND O
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q6
&END KIND
&KIND Y
ELEMENT Y
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q11
&END KIND
&KIND C
ELEMENT C
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q4
&END KIND
&KIND H
ELEMENT H
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q1
&END KIND
&END SUBSYS
&END FORCE_EVAL
&VIBRATIONAL_ANALYSIS
FULLY_PERIODIC
INTENSITIES
NPROC_REP 4
&END VIBRATIONAL_ANALYSIS
&MOTION
&CONSTRAINT
&FIXED_ATOMS
&END FIXED_ATOMS
&END CONSTRAINT
&GEO_OPT
OPTIMIZER LBFGS
TYPE MINIMIZATION
MAX_DR 4.5E-4
MAX_ITER 500
&END GEO_OPT
&END MOTION
On Saturday, August 23, 2025 at 7:45:05 PM UTC+5:30 Naina Sethi wrote:
> *Dear all,*
> I am working on calculating the vibrational frequencies and force
> constants of a water molecule. In CP2K, the force constants are reported in
> atomic units (Hartree/Bohr²), while Gaussian lists them in mDyne/Å. The
> conversion factor between Hartree/Bohr² and mDyne/Å is about 15.57.
> However, even after applying this factor, the results from CP2K do not
> match the force constant values reported by Gaussian. Could anyone clarify
> why this discrepancy occurs?
>
> Frc consts -- 1.7016 8.9360
> 9.7649 (gaussian)
> VIB|Frc consts (a.u.) 0.017668 0.567398 0.663392
> (CP2K)
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Naina
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/184f6f3d-8736-42fb-9c42-bb8cbd906defn%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250823/87d79e00/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list