[CP2K-user] [CP2K:21419] OT or DFT+U for k-points

Sheyoung Wang (W0728) growl1234 at outlook.com
Mon Apr 28 06:04:35 UTC 2025


Dear developers, 

I know that k-points are not supported when using OT or DFT+U.

The problem is that for many systems that are not trivial, the OT scheme 
always achieves SCF convergence, whereas the standard diagonal algorithm 
(no matter which parameter combination is used for mixing) fails even if 
the calculation is started from electron densities that achieve full 
convergence using the OT scheme. DFT+U is also necessary to consider for 
some systems, in some cases far more cost-effective than hybridized 
generalized functions such as PBE0 and HSE06.

If this problem could be solved, it would greatly improve the applicability 
of the CP2K software and make more efficient use of computational resources.

Therefore, I would like to know if there is a specific reason why OT and 
DFT+U are unable to support k-points or, more simply, if it has not yet 
been realized.

Thanks in advance for your help and clarification.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/2a01ba6a-7300-43d2-8d22-a40159dcb915n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250427/010f17d0/attachment.htm>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list