[CP2K-user] [CP2K:21320] SCF Convergence in High Impact Energy QM/MM Collisions
Nicholas Laws
nicholaslaws8 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 1 01:16:18 UTC 2025
Hi CP2K Community,
I hope this message finds you well. I am trying to perform a mixed QM/MM
high energy collision of a fast incident neutral (EMI-BF4) system (composed
of a cation, EMI+, and an anion, BF4-) with an Au surface. In my model, the
Au surface is handled at the MM level and initially placed about 20 Å away
from the EMI-BF4 (QM region). The incoming EMI-BF4 travels toward the Au
surface at approximately 100 eV, and my goal is to observe the
post-collision fragmentation and charge redistribution while preserving SCF
convergence.
However, I’m encountering SCF convergence issues. As bonds begin to break
from collision, the first few OUTER_SCF loops of the final time step prior
to failure converge seemingly well, but the SCF begins to diverge. I can
see the total electronic density on the regular grids creeping upward each
subsequent OUTER_SCF iteration, eventually leading to failed convergence.
Given this is a high-energy collision and the system is partly in vacuum
(non-periodic boundary conditions), I suspect that something about the
setup or the transition between the vacuum and the Au surface region might
be causing the SCF solver to struggle.
I’ve attached my input script (which shows the QM/MM method, the basis
sets, potentials (DZVP-GTH/PBE), and my MD parameters), output file, and
truncated trajectory file. I’m wondering if the community could suggest
best practices for the MGRID section (for example, choices of NGRIDS,
CUTOFF, REL_CUTOFF), or advice on how the cell size for the QM region might
need adjusting (e.g., wrapping/fragments drifting out of the defined
region). I’d also appreciate any tips on SCF convergence strategies (e.g.,
different guess methods, more robust smoothing for the density, or
alternative Poisson solver approaches) that might stabilize the calculation
in a high energy collision scenario.
Thank you very much for your time, and please let me know if you need any
further information.
All my best,
Nick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ba15268d-5199-4361-97b2-91b9cb3ba3f6n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250331/6f11dabf/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 100eV_EMIBF4_Surface_NVE-pos-1.xyz
Type: chemical/x-xyz
Size: 1295796 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250331/6f11dabf/attachment-0001.xyz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EMIBF4_Surface_100eV.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 234247 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250331/6f11dabf/attachment-0001.inp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EMIBF4_Surface_100eV.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 342108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20250331/6f11dabf/attachment-0001.obj>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list