[CP2K-user] [CP2K:19840] Cons. Qty for different ensembles + Pressure fluctuation
Léon Luntadila Lufungula
Leon.luntadilalufungula at uantwerpen.be
Mon Jan 29 10:00:54 UTC 2024
Dear Matthias,
My apologies, I forgot to add the input files. You can find them in
attachment to this message.
Kind regards,
Léon
On Monday 29 January 2024 at 10:36:30 UTC+1 Léon Luntadila Lufungula wrote:
> Dear Matthias,
>
> I've also tried to equilibrate a box of 216 water molecules with DFT and
> while the temperature and pressure seem to equilibrate quite easily, the
> constant of motion shows large jumps despite the potential and kinetic
> energy also being quite constant... If I'm not mistaken, the constant of
> motion in the NPT ensemble is the energy of the system + the energy of the
> thermostat + energy of barostat, as shown in this lecture
> <https://www.cp2k.org/_media/events:2016_summer_school:cp2k_moving_atoms.pdf>
> from 2016, so this would suggest that the fluctuations are due to the
> thermostat or barostat, right? Like the TIP3P NPT run, I used a thermostat
> timecon of 100 fs and a barostat timecon of 1000 fs and after 21 125 fs
> (blue vertical line in figures), I restarted the calculation and increased
> the thermostat timecon to 500 fs. I accidentaly set RESTART_BAROSTAT and
> RESTART_BAROSTAT_THERMOSTAT to FALSE upon restarting, but I'm unsure if
> this might have lead to the large jumps in the constant of motion later at
> t > 28 000 fs...
> [image: H2O-DFT-6x6x6-equilibration.png]
> Same goes for the NPT_F calculation of my solvated TiO2 slab. I did a 10
> ps simulation with thermostat timecon 50 and barostat timecon 100 and
> everything seems to equilibrate except for the constant of motion which
> seems to steadily rise. After 10 ps of simulation I restarted the
> calculation and again accidentaly messed up my input and set
> RESTART_BAROSTAT and RESTART_BAROSTAT_THERMOSTAT to FALSE but this time I
> didn't even change the timecons of the thermostat and barostat, but this
> time I immediately see a significant jump in the constant of motion after
> which it continues to increase... Any idea how I can fix this so that the
> constant of motion stays...well...constant?
> [image: a101-solv10-NPT_F-equilibration.png]
>
> Kind regards,
> Léon
>
> On Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 14:41:46 UTC+1 Léon Luntadila Lufungula
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Matthias,
>>
>> My AIMD calculations are on a slab wherein I keep my bottom layer fixed,
>> but apparently REGION MASSIVE is not compatible with constraints, so I'll
>> have to use REGION GLOBAL. Either way, thanks a lot for the detailed
>> answer! For a novice MD practicioner as myself this is already enough
>> information to get started! I'll try the values you suggested during my
>> production run while keeping an eye on the temperature and pressure during
>> the simulation; I guess when I've chosen my TIMECON too large, this will
>> result in the system drifting away from the equilibrium values.
>>
>> As always, thanks a lot for all the help!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Léon
>>
>> On Tuesday 23 January 2024 at 14:21:05 UTC+1 Krack Matthias wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Léon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Using a MASSIVE CSVR thermostat with a small TIMECON of about 50 is
>>> appropriate and efficient for equilibration. Thereafter, the TIMECON for
>>> the thermostat can be increased to 500-1000 for the sampling (production)
>>> runs and also a GLOBAL instead of a MASSIVE thermostat can be used, if
>>> possible, to reduce the impact of the thermostat on the dynamics. You will
>>> find different opinions about the absolute and relative values for the
>>> TIMECONs of thermostat and barostat in the web or literature. I suggest to
>>> use a two to five times larger TIMECON for the barostat compared to the
>>> thermostat. You have, however, to keep in mind that the appropriate (best)
>>> parameters for baro- and thermostat depend on the type of system and the
>>> selected conditions eventually.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> HTH
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *cp... at googlegroups.com <cp... at googlegroups.com> on behalf of
>>> Léon Luntadila Lufungula <Leon.luntad... at uantwerpen.be>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, 23 January 2024 at 11:47
>>> *To: *cp2k <cp... at googlegroups.com>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [CP2K:19801] Cons. Qty for different ensembles +
>>> Pressure fluctuation
>>>
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So I started an NpT directly from the inputs you gave me with a box
>>> containing 216 water molecules. After a 300ps equilibration (plots thus
>>> starrt at 0.3 ns), the pressure fluctuations are again in the 10kbar range
>>> which is okay as you pointed out, while the average pressure is around -14
>>> bar, so tha'ts also within the 20 bar range you mentioned. The energy drift
>>> per atom is also below 1K so everything seems to work reasonably.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm starting my AIMD simulations as we speak, so hopefully all goes well
>>> there too. I read that it is best to do a short equilibration with a strong
>>> coupling to the thermostat (e.g. CSVR, TIMECON 20 and REGION MASSIVE),
>>> before going to a weaker coupling (e.g. CSVR, TIMECON 200 and REGION
>>> GLOBAL), but is there also a rule of thumb w.r.t. the barostat TIMECON? I
>>> regularly see TIMECON 1000, but is it useful to set it to TIMECON 100 in
>>> this early equilibration?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for all the help already, it really helps me a lot given the fact
>>> that I don't have a senior researcher with a lot of hands-on CP2K
>>> experience around!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Léon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/c498aa90-e014-4484-869e-a94877dd9813n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20240129/48b33014/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: a101-solv10.md-NPT_F-eq1-n2-restarted.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 3990 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20240129/48b33014/attachment-0004.inp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: H2O-DFT-6x6x6.md-NPT-restarted.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 4156 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20240129/48b33014/attachment-0005.inp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: H2O-DFT-6x6x6.md-NPT.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 3944 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20240129/48b33014/attachment-0006.inp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: a101-solv10.md-NPT_F-eq1-n2.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 4005 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20240129/48b33014/attachment-0007.inp>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list