[CP2K-user] [CP2K:19953] Re: Improving convergence for bulk Iron (bcc Fe)
fsai...@gmail.com
fsaizpoy at gmail.com
Thu Feb 22 09:11:30 UTC 2024
Hello,
Have you tried to replicate the unit cell, say 5x5x5, and check if the SCF
cycles converge with this large system ?
Regards.
- Fernan
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 12:01:51 AM UTC+1 Бранислав Миловановић
wrote:
> Dear CP2K users,
>
> I'm struggling with convergence for bulk Fe, i.e. 3x3x3 supercell
> containing 54 Fe atoms. I wanted to simulate adsorption of different
> organic molecules on Fe(100) slab later, so this is my starting point.
>
> During GEO_OPT or CELL_OPT runs I sporadically encounter SCF issues like
> this:
> ...
> 33 Broy./Diag. 0.70E+00 2.7 1.02510462 -7902.0344477276
> 2.42E+01
> 34 Broy./Diag. 0.70E+00 2.7 1.02694146 -7882.2903511652
> 1.97E+01
> 35 Broy./Diag. 0.70E+00 2.7 1.02572163 -7833.4164745080
> 4.89E+01
> 36 Broy./Diag. 0.70E+00 2.7 1.02859994 -7878.1467068004
> -4.47E+01
> 37 Broy./Diag. 0.70E+00 2.7 1.02924599 -7812.2513589335
> 6.59E+01
> ...
>
> and here is my DFT section:
>
> &DFT
> BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME ${DIR}/BASIS_MOLOPT
> POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME ${DIR}/GTH_POTENTIALS
> UKS .TRUE.
> MULTIPLICITY 123
> RELAX_MULTIPLICITY 0.1
> CHARGE 0
> EXCITATIONS NONE
> PLUS_U_METHOD MULLIKEN # LOWDIN, MULLIKEN_CHARGES
> &SCF
> MAX_SCF 300
> EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
> SCF_GUESS RESTART
> ADDED_MOS 200
> NOTCONV_STOPALL .FALSE.
> CHOLESKY RESTORE
> &DIAGONALIZATION
> ALGORITHM STANDARD
> EPS_ADAPT 0.0 # Default 0.0
> MAX_ITER 2 # Default 2
> &END DIAGONALIZATION
> &MIXING
> METHOD BROYDEN_MIXING
> ALPHA 0.1 # Default 0.4
> BETA 1.2 # Default 0.5
> NBUFFER 6
> NMIXING 2
> NSKIP 0
> &END MIXING
> &SMEAR
> ELECTRONIC_TEMPERATURE [K] 500
> METHOD FERMI_DIRAC
> &END SMEAR
> &PRINT
> &RESTART
> BACKUP_COPIES 0
> &END RESTART
> &END PRINT
> &END SCF
> &MGRID
> NGRIDS 4
> CUTOFF 500
> REL_CUTOFF 50
> &END MGRID
> &QS
> METHOD GPW
> EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-12 # Default 1.0E-10
> EXTRAPOLATION ASPC # Default
> EXTRAPOLATION_ORDER 3 # Default
> &END QS
> &XC
> &XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE
> &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
> &VDW_POTENTIAL
> POTENTIAL_TYPE PAIR_POTENTIAL
> &PAIR_POTENTIAL
> R_CUTOFF 1.0583544171800002E+01 # Default
> TYPE DFTD3
> PARAMETER_FILE_NAME ${DIR}/dftd3.dat
> REFERENCE_FUNCTIONAL PBE
> &END PAIR_POTENTIAL
> &END VDW_POTENTIAL
> # &XC_GRID
> # XC_SMOOTH_RHO NN10
> # XC_DERIV SPLINE2_SMOOTH
> ## USE_FINER_GRID F
> # &END XC_GRID
> &END XC
> &END DFT
>
> What are your thoughts about parameters that I use? Do I set
> MAGNETIZATION, MULTIPLICITY and RELAX_MULTILIPLICITY correctly?
>
> I followed the instructions from the previous discussions here in group
> and assembled the attached input file. Also, I looked for discussions
> regarding metallic systems including Fe such as:
> https://groups.google.com/g/cp2k/c/ugkJLz4PSSI/m/C-ProBR6BwAJ
>
> I have an experience with the CP2K and molecular systems but not for solid
> state calculations.
> Also, I have a couple of questions:
> 1) How does CP2K copes with SYMMETRY set to .TRUE. Is it better to leave
> system to break symmetry?
> 2) Is it good to use XC_SMOOTH_RHO to smooth XC grid in this case?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Branislav
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/e6ea04c5-8e81-4d34-8268-8dbe779eab07n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20240222/ee24698e/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list