[CP2K-user] [CP2K:20991] ENERGY_FORCE calculation not converging on same ENERGY runs

[Jürg Hutter]

Hi

yes, there seems something to be wrong. However, from a single number it is impossible to
get what the problem is.

regards
JH

________________________________________
From: cp2k at googlegroups.com <cp2k at googlegroups.com> on behalf of Hezhou Zhang <lzhanghz at uchicago.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 6:45 PM
To: cp2k
Subject: Re: [CP2K:20985] ENERGY_FORCE calculation not converging on same ENERGY runs

Dear Jürg,

Thanks for the response and sorry for the ambiguity. The 4 energies are from four different frames.
The problem is that, for the first frame on the right panel (with ENERGY_FORCE), the same condition gives a non-convergence and wrong energy, where only running ENERGY gives a converged result.
The EPS convergence threshold does not concern me for now.

Regards,
Hezhou
On Wednesday, December 18, 2024 at 3:37:08 AM UTC-6 Jürg Hutter wrote:
Hi

after rereading your mail, I might have misunderstood your question.
What are the energies 1-4 ? Where are they coming from?

regards
JH

________________________________________
From: cp... at googlegroups.com <cp... at googlegroups.com> on behalf of Jürg Hutter <hut... at chem.uzh.ch>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 10:34 AM
To: cp... at googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [CP2K:20980] ENERGY_FORCE calculation not converging on same ENERGY runs

Hi

you are restarting both calculations. From the initial energy it seems for energy_force this was
not optimal. However, this would not lead to different results if your EPS_SCF would be smaller.
With the value you chose 10^-5 SCF stops rather early and energy is only correct to about 5 digits.

regards
JH

________________________________________
From: cp... at googlegroups.com <cp... at googlegroups.com> on behalf of Hezhou Zhang <lzha... at uchicago.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 12:06 AM
To: cp2k
Subject: [CP2K:20978] ENERGY_FORCE calculation not converging on same ENERGY runs

Dear CP2K community,

I'm benchmarking a UKS calculation on a small system. By only changing GLOBAL RUNTYPE from ENERGY to ENERGY_FORCE and printing FORCE in FORCE_EVAL, the calculations that successfully converged on ENERGY calculations failed to converge in ENERGY_FORCE, and gave a drastically wrong energy. This occurred in versions 7.1 and 2023.2 seemingly randomly, but I haven't tried others. Any idea why this is happening? Thank you all!

Regards,
Hezhou

[Screenshot 2024-12-16 170212.png]

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/2d457180-b004-4e01-8928-a74c0f52df31n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/2d457180-b004-4e01-8928-a74c0f52df31n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZR0P278MB0759485EB6766D4CC476F1AA9F052%40ZR0P278MB0759.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ae29b4cb-e2fe-4c84-a430-b4ea20c943fcn%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ae29b4cb-e2fe-4c84-a430-b4ea20c943fcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB0753D5FB6A3FF11B97858E6E9F072%40ZRAP278MB0753.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.