[CP2K-user] [CP2K:20112] Re: Dipole correction for solvated slab
Matt Watkins
mattwatkinsuk at gmail.com
Wed Apr 17 11:46:41 UTC 2024
Check literature. For decent sized system with polar solvent probably not
significant.
On Wednesday 17 April 2024 at 09:08:56 UTC+1 Léon Luntadila Lufungula wrote:
> Hi Matt
>
> Thanks for the answer, I also thought a surface dipole correction without
> vacuum did not make sense.
> So is it correct then to ignore enabling the surface dipole correction
> <https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/DFT.html#CP2K_INPUT.FORCE_EVAL.DFT.SURFACE_DIPOLE_CORRECTION>in
> a fully solvated system or is there some other way to correct for possible
> periodic artefacts?
>
> Kind regards
> Léon
>
> On Wednesday 17 April 2024 at 10:05:02 UTC+2 Matt Watkins wrote:
>
>> Applying a dipole correction self consistently in the calculation only
>> makes sense with a vacuum present.
>> There are energy correction terms arising from dipoles that can be
>> applied in many situations to account for periodic artifacts.
>> Matt
>>
>> On Monday 15 April 2024 at 09:54:21 UTC+1 Léon Luntadila Lufungula wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I'm looking for an answer to a simple (and probably stupid) question.
>>>
>>> I know that you need to set up a dipole correction when modeling a slab
>>> in vacuum with 3D periodic boundary conditions, but I was wondering if this
>>> is also necessary when the vacuum is filled with solvent molecules? From
>>> what I understand, the dipole correction is performed in the vacuum region
>>> and results in a flat profile of the electrostatic potential plot inside
>>> the vacuum region (apart from the region where the correction is applied)
>>> as you would expect for such a plot in the vacuum region. So a dipole
>>> correction seems incorrect adn ill-defined in a system without vacuum,
>>> however, I have heard from several people that they do apply a dipole
>>> correction even in a solvated system... Perhaps they used a different type
>>> of solvated system where there is still a vacuum region present (i.e., a
>>> vacuum-solvent-slab-solvent-vacuum box)?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Léon
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/04977b9f-4b6d-4342-9d42-8daa2d0f6e16n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20240417/529c7031/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list