[CP2K-user] [CP2K:19322] cp2k vs. gaussian software

[K.AK]

Dear experts,

I am performing DFT calculations using the QS method. 

Also, I did the same optimization using Gaussian. 
In the case of Gaussian software, the simulated conditions were below.
Basis set: 6-31G(d,p), Simulation: DFT, B3LYP

But, the results of atomic charge caluculated from Mulliken population are 
much different. 
(I used ALL_POTINTIALS at cp2k/data/ as potentials.)

Please advise about the cp2k simulation method and input file.

I am putting in attachment my input. 

Best wishes
K.AK

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/426b357e-e93c-42e9-b401-5e0e96016ca6n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20231009/53575216/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cp2k.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 3261 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20231009/53575216/attachment.inp>