[CP2K-user] [CP2K:19060] Unexpected 0D wavelet errors at large vacuum

Jürg Hutter hutter at chem.uzh.ch
Wed Jul 5 11:57:46 UTC 2023


Hi

works for me. Only change was to set the CELL in the input file:

    &CELL
      ABC [angstrom]  25.000   25.000  25.000
      PERIODIC NONE
    &END CELL

regards
JH

________________________________________
From: cp2k at googlegroups.com <cp2k at googlegroups.com> on behalf of Léon Luntadila Lufungula <Leon.luntadilalufungula at uantwerpen.be>
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 1:41 PM
To: cp2k
Subject: Re: [CP2K:19060] Unexpected 0D wavelet errors at large vacuum

Hi Jurg,

Thanks for the tip, but I already tried this and it didn't work. I have tried once more and the results are in attachment... Any other suggestions?

Best,
Léon

On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 at 13:03:51 UTC+2 Jürg Hutter wrote:
Hi

add center coordinates to your Topolgy section

&TOPOLOGY
COORD_FILE_NAME mol.cif
COORD_FILE_FORMAT cif
&CENTER_COORDINATES
&END
&END TOPOLOGY

regards
JH

________________________________________
From: cp... at googlegroups.com <cp... at googlegroups.com> on behalf of Léon Luntadila Lufungula <Leon.luntad... at uantwerpen.be>
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 12:03 PM
To: cp2k
Subject: [CP2K:19057] Unexpected 0D wavelet errors at large vacuum

Hi all,

I have a quick question regarding the 0D wavelet solver. I tried using it to calculate the energy of an isolated molecule and noticed some weird behaviour regarding the vacuum padding. At 2.5 Å vacuum around the molecule, I got an error saying "density non-zero on the edges of the unit cell: wrong results in WAVELET solver", so I increased the vacuum to 5 Å and this suppressed the error message. I wanted to see the effect of the vacuum on the energy so I also increased the vacuum to compare the energies. At 7.5 Å it all worked as expected, but then at 10 Å I again get errors stating that the density is non-zero at the edges, even when I include CENTER_COORDINATES. Can someone explain why this is happening? It seems very counterintuitive as it is exactly the same molecule and the only difference is that the vacuum padding around the molecule has increased...

The outputs for 5, 7.5 and 10 Å are in attachment. The one with 2.5 Å, I seem to have deleted already as it resulting in the errors stated above.

Best,
Léon

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/589fb184-702d-485e-b911-5a75da8dae66n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/589fb184-702d-485e-b911-5a75da8dae66n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/e7995875-2d28-41ca-8eaa-d69146b28775n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/e7995875-2d28-41ca-8eaa-d69146b28775n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZR0P278MB07592E33A9BCF4AD767CB1169F2FA%40ZR0P278MB0759.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list