[CP2K-user] [CP2K:17739] Need help to increase compute speed
Dev Rana
dev.rana3 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 22 18:09:03 UTC 2022
Hi lucas,
Thank you for this. This definitely speeds things up.
I feel like I'm missing something in your explanation. You say that 62 Cu +
1 C = 686 electrons total. Cu has 29 electrons * 62 Cu atoms = 1798. 1 C =
6 electrons. So This should be 1802. With roughly half occupied = 901 and
20% of that is still roughly 200. I agree that 200 is too much - but how
you obtained 70 is a bit confusing to me.
Could you explain how you reached your conclusion?
Thanks!
On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 7:37:56 PM UTC-4 Lucas Lodeiro wrote:
> Hello Rev Rana,
>
> From your input, I see 2 thing that could improve your calculation. First
> you use a CUTOFF of 600 and a REL_CUTOFF of 250. This is a little weird to
> me... usually REL_CUTOFF is around 60.... using higher values will slow
> down your calculation without a real improvement over the calculation
> results. Do you do a convergence study of these parameters?
> Second, you are adding 200 MOs to your calculation... Obviously you need
> some virtual orbitals to use the smearing, but the greater the number of
> these, the slower the calculation is. So, 200 is in my opinion too much.
> Your system has 62 Cu and 1 C atoms, with 686 electrons in total, this is
> 343 occupied orbitals (only as a mental exercise). Usually adding 20% more
> orbitals is enough. so adding just 70 orbitals would be sufficient, and
> make your calculations faster.
>
> Regards - Lucas
>
>
> El lun, 25 jul 2022 a las 20:01, Dev Rana (<dev.... at gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm having some trouble conducting an MD simulation. Each SCF iteration
>> takes about 100-200 seconds taking about 15-30 iterations per MD step.
>> Could someone experienced take a look at my input file to see if there is
>> any input which could be added/removed to increase speed? I've attached my
>> restart file containing all information.
>>
>> I'm using a computing node with openMPI OMP threads set to 2, and 64
>> cores on a single exclusive node (no multi-node delays).
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Devyesh Rana
>>
>> --
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/285a3ca8-132d-479a-b0e6-edcd98c899f5n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/285a3ca8-132d-479a-b0e6-edcd98c899f5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/a6c9cc14-476f-4e41-89c6-b849814bf96an%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220922/116ddd9a/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list