[CP2K-user] [CP2K:17739] Need help to increase compute speed

Dev Rana dev.rana3 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 22 18:09:03 UTC 2022


Hi lucas,

Thank you for this. This definitely speeds things up.

I feel like I'm missing something in your explanation. You say that 62 Cu + 
1 C = 686 electrons total. Cu has 29 electrons * 62 Cu atoms = 1798. 1 C = 
6 electrons. So This should be 1802. With roughly half occupied = 901 and 
20% of that is still roughly 200. I agree that 200 is too much - but how 
you obtained 70 is a bit confusing to me.

Could you explain how you reached your conclusion?

Thanks!

On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 7:37:56 PM UTC-4 Lucas Lodeiro wrote:

> Hello Rev Rana,
>
> From your input, I see 2 thing that could improve your calculation. First 
> you use a CUTOFF of 600 and a REL_CUTOFF of 250. This is a little weird to 
> me... usually REL_CUTOFF is around 60.... using higher values will slow 
> down your calculation without a real improvement over the calculation 
> results. Do you do a convergence study of these parameters?
> Second, you are adding 200 MOs to your calculation... Obviously you need 
> some virtual orbitals to use the smearing, but the greater the number of 
> these, the slower the calculation is. So, 200 is in my opinion too much. 
> Your system has 62 Cu and 1 C atoms, with 686 electrons in total, this is 
> 343 occupied orbitals (only as a mental exercise). Usually adding 20% more 
> orbitals is enough. so adding just 70 orbitals would be sufficient, and 
> make your calculations faster.
>
> Regards - Lucas
>
>
> El lun, 25 jul 2022 a las 20:01, Dev Rana (<dev.... at gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm having some trouble conducting an MD simulation. Each SCF iteration 
>> takes about 100-200 seconds taking about 15-30 iterations per MD step. 
>> Could someone experienced take a look at my input file to see if there is 
>> any input which could be added/removed to increase speed? I've attached my 
>> restart file containing all information. 
>>
>> I'm using a computing node with openMPI OMP threads set to 2, and 64 
>> cores on a single exclusive node (no multi-node delays). 
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Devyesh Rana
>>
>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/285a3ca8-132d-479a-b0e6-edcd98c899f5n%40googlegroups.com 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/285a3ca8-132d-479a-b0e6-edcd98c899f5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/a6c9cc14-476f-4e41-89c6-b849814bf96an%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220922/116ddd9a/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list