[CP2K-user] [CP2K:17692] Re: SGCPMD: problem with equilibration?
Alexandra Dávila
a.celinda.dl at gmail.com
Thu Sep 15 11:34:39 UTC 2022
Dear Onofrio,
thanks a lot for your fast response! Indeed, I did a NVE simulation with
Langevin (as suggested here:https://www.cp2k.org/howto:md). Then I used
the geometry and wfn for the SGCPMD.
As you, I use TEMP_TOL, but I set it to the value of 50 for each region. Do
you think that it makes the difference?
This are the parameters that I used for the NVE:
&MD
ENSEMBLE LANGEVIN
STEPS 6000
TIMESTEP 5.0E-01
TEMPERATURE 3.3000000000000006E+02
TEMP_KIND T
SCALE_TEMP_KIND T
&LANGEVIN
GAMMA 1.0000000000000000E-03
NOISY_GAMMA 0
&END LANGEVIN
&THERMAL_REGION
DO_LANGEVIN_DEFAULT F
&DEFINE_REGION
DO_LANGEVIN F
LIST 145..546
TEMPERATURE 3.3000000000000006E+02
NOISY_GAMMA_REGION 2.1999999999999998E-04
TEMP_TOL 50
&END DEFINE_REGION
&DEFINE_REGION
DO_LANGEVIN F
LIST 73..144
TEMPERATURE 3.3000000000000006E+02
NOISY_GAMMA_REGION 4.9999999999999996E-05
TEMP_TOL 50
&END DEFINE_REGION
&END THERMAL_REGION
&END MD
The NOISY_GAMMA is not considered in the simulation. Is there something not
so good with the set of parameters I used?
[image: NVE_00_TempLANGEVIN.png]
I appreciate a lot your feedback!
Best regards,
Aexandra
El jueves, 15 de septiembre de 2022 a las 12:53:45 UTC+2,
onofr... at gmail.com escribió:
> Dear Alexandra,
> have you done an equilibration step before starting the SGCPMD run?
> As I can see from your plots it seems that it is not equilibrated yet. I
> suggest you to make a BOMD run first for better equilibration, then
> switching to sgcpmd, as follows:
> 1. BOMD as NVE ensemble + TEMP_TOL 100
> 2. switch to SGCPMD using RESTART.wfn of the previous equilibration step
> as a wfn guess
> It works for me.
> Hope it helps
>
> Regards
>
> Onofrio
>
> Il giorno giovedì 15 settembre 2022 alle 12:04:35 UTC+2
> a.celi... at gmail.com ha scritto:
>
>> Dear Cp2k users,
>> I have carried on a second-generation Car-Parrinello (SGCP) MD simulation
>> for Pt(111)/water interface. Unit cell contains Pt: 6x6x4 (2 frozen
>> layers), water: 134 molecules.
>>
>> I have performed a similar workflow as Onofrio ("SGCPMD: number of steps
>> per SCF run increase suddenly after initial 400 MD steps"). But I have
>> used the NOISY_GAMMA as in the publication *"First-Principles
>> Simulations of an Aqueous CO/Pt(111) Interface"
>> doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05933, *Pt: 5E-05 1/fs and for water 2.2E-04
>> 1/fs. Temperature is set to 330K.
>>
>> Unfortunately, in my case along the SGMD the temperature of Pt region
>> drops to roughly 180 K, the temperature of the hole system is about 328K. I
>> expected that the temperature of Pt region would be closer to the water
>> after a equilibration time of 4ps. Does this mean that probably my system
>> is not well-equilibrated? Is this going to affect the dynamics and energy
>> of the system? (PS: the density profile seems ok, double peak on oxygen,
>> well-known for Pt(111))
>>
>> Many thanks in advance!
>> Alexandra
>>
>> PS: I also observed the increase of the SCF steps after a restart!
>>
>> TOP: red dashed line: average temperature of system
>> BOTTOM: temperature for each region
>>
>> [image: SGMD_00MD_Temp.png][image: SGMD_00MD_TempLAN.png]
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/638c937e-52db-495e-b1fb-6cf4fde2a7cen%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220915/cfa7a2d7/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NVE_00_TempLANGEVIN.png
Type: image/png
Size: 61629 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220915/cfa7a2d7/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list