[CP2K-user] [CP2K:17585] Large discrepancy in xTB results from CP2K vs DFTB+
Magnus Rahm
magnus at compulartech.com
Thu Sep 1 10:48:35 UTC 2022
Dear all,
I want to use CP2K (version 8.2, trying to get a more recent version
compiled) together with xTB for a crystal containing Li and O. I get
strange results already for a simple LiO2 crystal:
* There is a very large discrepancy compared to DFTB+ (version 22.1).
* Mulliken charges tend to be large, meaning that CHECK_ATOMIC_CHARGES
stops the SCF. If I turn it off, the system tends to converge
systematically to values just outside the "chemical range". Mulliken
charges obtained by DFTB+ are significantly smaller (and within "chemical
range").
* The energy-volume curve looks strange and very different from DFTB+.
I have tried converging with respect to system size and the EWALD / ALPHA
and GMAX parameters, but they have only a marginal impact. I have tried
similar calculations for a number of periodic systems. Sometimes I get
agreement, sometimes not. I also tried calculations for CO and NO molecules
which agree perfectly between CP2K and DFTB+, whereas an artificial LiF
molecule does not.
A perhaps related issue was reported in
https://groups.google.com/g/cp2k/c/oFwgGcQuySs but the solutions suggested
there did not solve my problem.
I attach input scripts for CP2K and DFTB+, as well as a figure showing the
E-V curve for LiO2 obtained with CP2K and DFTB+. I'm new to CP2K, DFTB+ and
xTB so I suspect I have made some simple mistake, and any advice is
appreciated.
Kind regards,
Magnus Rahm
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/2b7a001c-6e70-4e27-bb1d-cd6c1f4765f9n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220901/6b29dbb6/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: run.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220901/6b29dbb6/attachment-0001.inp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: structure.xyz
Type: chemical/x-xyz
Size: 17630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220901/6b29dbb6/attachment-0001.xyz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: POSCAR
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 20595 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220901/6b29dbb6/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dftb_in.hsd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 509 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220901/6b29dbb6/attachment-0003.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EV-nonrelaxed.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 16121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220901/6b29dbb6/attachment-0001.pdf>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list