[CP2K-user] [CP2K:17857] Re: Vibrational analisys
Lucas Lodeiro
elunicolomo at gmail.com
Thu Oct 13 15:37:49 UTC 2022
Hi Marcella,
I expressed it badly, I want to say that each displaced atomic
configuration needs an energy+gradient calculation, this is 6N
energy+gradient evaluations, plus the minimum energy geometry. Of course
the number of output files is equal to the replica layout, but my problem
is that the number of energy+gradient evaluations into all these replica
outputs is not equal to 6N.
A practical example, I have an 8 atom isolated molecule, so it needs 48
energy+gradient evaluations which are printed in the main output correctly.
I launched this calculation in a node with 20 cores, so the replica layout
is 20 and there are 20 output files. When I see these output files I check
there are 5 energy computations into each output, so there are 5*20=100
energy evaluations. This is the point which makes me worried. I do not
understand why there are that huge amount of energy evaluations when 6N=48.
Regards - Lucas
El mié, 12 oct 2022 a las 4:51, Marcella Iannuzzi (<marci.akira at gmail.com>)
escribió:
>
> Hi Lucas
>
> The number of output files of the type ${projectname}-r-#.out
> should be equal to REPLICA| layout of the replica grid, number of groups
> and not to 6N
>
> Kind regards
> Marcella
>
> On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 12:35:08 AM UTC+2 Lucas Lodeiro wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a detailed doubt about the files and data printed for a
>> vibrational analysis. AFAIK, the calculation is done by numerical
>> differentiation of gradients (differentiation in both directions and
>> average them) so for a molecule with N atoms it needs 6N calculations,
>> which is clearly printed in the main output. Also, each
>> replica/configurationn (6N) is computed and a particular output is printed
>> for each one.
>> Up to this point everything looks fine, but when I see the particular
>> replica output, there are 5 energy computations into the output... I would
>> expect just one.
>> Why is this happening? Am I missing something?
>>
>> Regards - Lucas
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/90776d8b-086e-4772-8683-8dd97b5afc8dn%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/90776d8b-086e-4772-8683-8dd97b5afc8dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAOFT4PK1M0X6CqBpz%3D4G6V84g3fdxP35FqFrONa3rw9sp9_wdg%40mail.gmail.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20221013/61acde6e/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list