[CP2K-user] [CP2K:18004] Re: Convergence failure and incorrect solvation energy with SCCS in cp2k-2022.1

[Krack Matthias (PSI)]

Hi Anton

You are free to add explicit water molecules when using SCCS, but that’s not required, though it might be better to have some explicit water.

Best

Matthias

From: cp2k at googlegroups.com <cp2k at googlegroups.com> on behalf of Anton Lytvynenko <anton.s.lytvynenko at gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 8 November 2022 at 10:28
To: cp2k at googlegroups.com <cp2k at googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CP2K:17995] Re: Convergence failure and incorrect solvation energy with SCCS in cp2k-2022.1

Dear Krack, dear all,

I'd like to ask another related question -- if SCCS is capable to model water without addition of some explicit water molecules in such situation?

Yours,

Anton
08.11.2022 10:17, Krack Matthias (PSI) пише:
Hi Wiko


1.       That’s indeed a problem.

2.       That’s correct, SCCS is meant to work with POISSON_SOLVER periodic and PERIODIC xyz.

Best

Matthias

From: cp2k at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k at googlegroups.com> <cp2k at googlegroups.com><mailto:cp2k at googlegroups.com> on behalf of Wiko Ann <todaymimm at gmail.com><mailto:todaymimm at gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 8 November 2022 at 03:44
To: cp2k <cp2k at googlegroups.com><mailto:cp2k at googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CP2K:17992] Re: Convergence failure and incorrect solvation energy with SCCS in cp2k-2022.1
Dear Matthias:

Thanks a lot for your reply. The electrostatic energy is posted below.
1. I did use k points and smearing in the calculation of slab. It should be the problem.
2. Did you mean if I want to obtain the solvation energy of H3O+, I can use “PSOLVER MT” and “PERIODIC NONE” to calculate cluster energy in gas phase, and then use the default setting when applying SCCS?

Regards

Wiko

[cid:part1.OfObjrda.NGaB1YUi at gmail.com]
在2022年11月8日星期二 UTC+8 00:08:09<Matthias Krack> 写道：
PS: Do not use with SCCS “PSOLVER MT” and “PERIODIC NONE” but the defaults.

M.

From: cp... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com> <cp... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com>> on behalf of Krack Matthias (PSI) <matthia... at psi.ch<mailto:matthia... at psi.ch>>
Date: Monday, 7 November 2022 at 16:53
To: cp... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com> <cp... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com>>
Subject: Re: [CP2K:17989] Re: Convergence failure and incorrect solvation energy with SCCS in cp2k-2022.1
Hi Wiko


1.       Slab: SCCS in CP2K is not implemented for k points and not yet tested with smearing. I guess that you are using one of these features for the Ag(111) slab which might cause problems.

2.       H3O+: The results are sensible to the choice of the parameters RHO_MIN and RHO_MAX. Their values differ especially for neutral and ionic systems. What do you get for the electrostatic part of the solvation energy?

Just as minor improvements (do not help for the issue above), I suggest to use for H3O+ the default diagonalization instead of OT (i.e. &OT off) and a smaller EPS_DEFAULT value (at least 1.0E-12 instead of 1.0E-10).

Best

Matthias

From: cp... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com> <cp... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com>> on behalf of Wiko Ann <toda... at gmail.com<mailto:toda... at gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, 7 November 2022 at 14:56
To: cp2k <cp... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com>>
Subject: [CP2K:17989] Re: Convergence failure and incorrect solvation energy with SCCS in cp2k-2022.1
在2022年11月7日星期一 UTC+8 21:51:15<Wiko Ann> 写道：
Hello, everyone:

I was trying to apply solvation effect to the Ag(111)-H3O+ system, while I met several problems.

1. The first problem is the convergence of Ag(111) surface. I built a 4*4*3 Ag(111) slab. The system could hardly converge when implicit solvation model was used. While in gas phase, it converged successfully.  Are there some tricks to make it converge?

2. Another problem is more confusing. The solvation energy of H3O+ differs a lot from the experimental value as well as the values calculated by other solvation models such as VASPsol. I've tried to change the parameters in SCCS sections according to the article  [Self-consistent continuum solvation (SCCS): The case of charged systems. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 214110 (2013) ], and try to change the Poisson solver, but I still couldn't obtain a reasonable result. Why is there such a huge difference? Did I misuse SCCS section?

I'm new to CP2K, and I didn't know whether I set somethings wrong in the input file or I missed some subtle but important details. I'll appreciate it if someone can give me some advice on these problems, since solvation is vital in predicting the energy of H3O+ and the interaction of metal surface and adsorbates.

The input file is attached below.

Thanks a lot!

Wiko
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/0420c53c-f0bb-49dc-85fa-2124328053d8n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/0420c53c-f0bb-49dc-85fa-2124328053d8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB08274F9BF3607A244882B3C3F43C9%40ZRAP278MB0827.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB08274F9BF3607A244882B3C3F43C9%40ZRAP278MB0827.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ea085a09-02d3-425f-ac2c-cfcf2f1564e6n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ea085a09-02d3-425f-ac2c-cfcf2f1564e6n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB0827413D164197DF78B9DC76F43F9%40ZRAP278MB0827.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB0827413D164197DF78B9DC76F43F9%40ZRAP278MB0827.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/37c2571e-99f6-0535-d8e7-e8d3813118c8%40gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/37c2571e-99f6-0535-d8e7-e8d3813118c8%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB082703DA579071D939E44035F43E9%40ZRAP278MB0827.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20221109/d8b5c0c7/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 314369 bytes
Desc: pic1.png
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20221109/d8b5c0c7/attachment-0001.png>