[CP2K-user] [CP2K:17158] Re: Relation between cell size and computational time/required memory

Sam Broderick waveman68 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 14 07:46:41 UTC 2022


Hi Mostafa

Cell size directly affects your calculation times. If you double a side for 
a cubic cell, I would naively expect scaling on the order of O(3) or as the 
cube. It's a bit more complicated, but keep the cells as small as possible. 
Note that there is no separate simulation box in cp2k: cell in sold state 
physics sense equals cp2k simulation box. If you don't have a repeating 
cell, add PERIODIC NONE.

Kind Regards

Sam
On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 8:47:24 PM UTC+2 abedimo... at gmail.com wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
> I've been trying to get the potential energies and forces for a certain 
> number of atoms at different mass densities, from high to very low, under 
> PBC. I've realized that as the cell size gets larger (going to the lower 
> densities) the computational time and particularly the required memory 
> increases. Now I have a cell with the length of 60 Å and it can not be 
> run because it asks a lot of memory. I wonder if there is any correlation 
> between the cell size and computational time/required memory and if so, how 
> it scales. I should say I could mange to run the case with the cell size of 
> 50 x 50 x 50 Å. Thanks.
>
> Best,
> Mostafa
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/591cdfc9-e4e5-4f09-9b73-4eae0331579an%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220614/fa7c05a4/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list