[CP2K-user] [CP2K:17348] Geometry Optimization with Brent's Algorithm: CP2K and VASP

Nicholas Winner nwinner at berkeley.edu
Thu Jul 21 23:12:53 UTC 2022


Hi all, 

I'm working with some people that are using VASP while I am using CP2K. 
While CP2K has really fast SCF procedure, it seems to be slower when it 
comes to geometry optimization for some reason.

I've dug into VASP's manual and they claim that their CG method uses "a 
modified version of Brent's algorithm." No further details are given. 
Normally with CP2K, I use 2PNT line search with my CG minimizations, and I 
think this is pretty standard for everyone else. I do know that CP2K 
supports FIT and GOLD line search options which use Brent's algorithm 
(actually I don't 100% know how FIT and Brent's Algorithm are related, but 
gold uses it at least). However, GOLD line search is very slow in CP2K, as 
we are warned in the manual.

So, my hunch, is that CP2K with some type of gold or fit line search would 
be able to match this "modified Brent's algorithm" and provide faster 
minimization than what I am currently getting. Are there some insights that 
people can provide for choosing settings for gold line search that can give 
decent results? To remind, the flags we have to play with are:

BRACK_LIMIT {Real}
*Limit in 1D bracketing during line search in Conjugate Gradients 
Optimization.*
Default value: 1.00000000E+002


BRENT_MAX_ITER {Integer}
*Maximum number of iterations in brent algorithm (used for the line search 
in Conjugated Gradients Optimization)*
Default value: 100

BRENT_TOL {Real}
*Tolerance requested during Brent line search in Conjugate Gradients 
Optimization.*
Default value: 1.00000000E-002

INITIAL_STEP {Real}
*Initial step size used, e.g. for bracketing or minimizers. Might need to 
be reduced for systems with close contacts*
Default value: 2.00000000E-001


Could it be that VASP uses a loose value for BRENT_TOL, or maybe a small 
number of max steps? Furthermore, what is the tolerance in the algorithm? 
Tolerance for the atomic position refinement, or forces?


If anyone has any ideas, it would be much appreciated.

-Nick

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/c3f8726c-7587-4240-8e97-c2a97f3ebdafn%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220721/c2a41564/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list