[CP2K-user] [CP2K:16610] Re: AIMD Simulation of water

[Niharendu Choudhury]

Thanks Ivan, for your prompt help and for referring to  such an excellent 
review, which currently I am going through.
I'll try to run with SCAN and if any further difficulty appears, I will 
write to the list again.

Best regards
Niharendu Choudhury

On Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 12:21:05 PM UTC+5:30 igladi... at gmail.com 
wrote:

> Hi 
> yes CP2K with SCAN is possible, see
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/cp2k/c/hKU0yMZXzfU/m/HxaWxHx9BwAJ
>
> There are also the pseudopotential for SCAN
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/cp2k/c/k0M3XuOdIHI/m/TEeDFRMwAAAJ
>
> Regarding DFT for water, you can start from here
>
> https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4944633
>
> Hope it helps
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 2:47:00 PM UTC+3 nihar... at gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> Dear experts,
>> I found (PNAS 114, 10846-10851 (2017)) that SCAN (strongly constrained 
>> and appropriately normed) functional is very good for water properties. Do 
>> we have this option in CP2K?
>>
>> Can anybody suggest me (any review or so) regarding which functional is 
>> the best for water simulations?
>>
>> Warm regards
>> Niharendu Choudhury
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/5bd2bc6b-592c-4056-88f7-eacd6ad82b1an%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220217/0ebb0d7a/attachment.htm>