[CP2K-user] [CP2K:16568] How to use ECP potential in FORCE_EVAL
Eugene
roginovicci at gmail.com
Tue Feb 8 10:20:54 UTC 2022
Dear Juerg,
I'm sorry for confusion. I was asking about documentation "bug". From
explanation given here: https://www.cp2k.org/basis_sets It is more or less
clear that for d-orbitals one have to use 5 numbers in line 9. But nothing
said about the case when s- and p-orbitals are given separately.
Anyway I'm really appracieted for you gentle help.
Sincerely,
Eugene
вторник, 8 февраля 2022 г. в 12:32:42 UTC+3, jgh:
> Hi
>
> basis sets and pseudopotentials are not coupled in the CP2K input.
> You can mix (even if it doesn't make sense) whatever you want.
>
> Shell sets (per atom) is the first lone number in the basis set definition.
> In your case this is 4, so you get 84*4 Shell sets in total. As, again in
> your case, each set has exactly 1 shell, you get the same number of
> total shells.
> Other basis sets have less sets (e.g. MOLOPT have 1 set), but more shells
> per
> set. Everything is as it should be, there is no bug here.
>
> regards
>
> Juerg Hutter
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491 <+41%2044%20635%2044%2091>
> Institut für Chemie E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
> Universität Zürich
> Winterthurerstrasse 190
> CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
> To: "cp2k" <cp... at googlegroups.com>
> From: "Eugene"
> Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
> Date: 02/07/2022 08:02PM
> Subject: Re: [CP2K:16561] How to use ECP potential in FORCE_EVAL
>
> Hi Jeurg,
> Cool it works. But number of MO is not the same for ECP and GTH. Now for
> ECP we have:
> Total number of - Atomic kinds: 2
> - Atoms: 84
> - Shell sets: 336
> - Shells: 336
> Number of Shell cets is not equivalent to number of atoms, while in GTH
> this is the case. Maybe it is common for ECP. So, it means CP2K
> Documentation is not complete. Should I give a BUG report?
> Warm wishes,
> Eugene
> понедельник, 7 февраля 2022 г. в 21:54:50 UTC+3, jgh:
> Hi
>
> check your basis set definition: the p shell says:
>
> 2 1 1 6 0 1 # Gauss type functions l=1 set 1 (3p orbital)
>
> That would be zero p-orbitals. Probably a typo. It should be
>
> 2 1 1 6 1 0 # Gauss type functions l=1 set 1 (3p orbital)
>
> Please also note that this is a not very well tested option.
> I'm not aware of any successful application using ECPs with CP2K.
>
> regards
>
> Juerg Hutter
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491 <+41%2044%20635%2044%2091>
> Institut für Chemie E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
> Universität Zürich
> Winterthurerstrasse 190
> CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
> To: "cp2k" <cp... at googlegroups.com>
> From: "Eugene"
> Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
> Date: 02/07/2022 05:30PM
> Subject: [CP2K:16557] How to use ECP potential in FORCE_EVAL
>
> According to cp2k documentation
> https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/SUBSYS/KIND.html#POTENTIAL
> it is possible to set POTENTIAL variable value as ECP, in order to use
> Effective core potential. I've converted basis set from
> http://www.tc.uni-koeln.de/PP/clickpse.en.html according to CP2K
> documentation. The section KIND in my input file is:
> &KIND V
> BASIS_SET STOLL-PBE
> POTENTIAL ECP
> &POTENTIAL
> V nelec 10
> V ul
> 2 1.000000000 0.000000000
> V S
> 2 14.490000000 178.447971000
> 2 6.524000000 19.831375000
> V P
> 2 14.300000000 109.529763000
> 2 6.021000000 12.570310000
> V D
> 2 17.480000000 -19.219657000
> 2 5.709000000 -0.642775000
> &END
> &END KIND
> The basis set in new file is:
> V STOLL-PBE
> 4
> 2 0 0 7 1 0 # Gauss type functions l=0 set 1 (3s orbital)
> 12.8432080 0.460448
> 11.3757530 -0.495309
> 5.4069740 -0.350821
> 1.4659270 0.654979
> 0.5980800 0.582548
> 0.0887900 0.017081
> 0.0353180 -0.007455
> 2 0 0 7 1 0 # Gauss type functions l=0 set 2 (4s orbital)
> 12.8432080 0.126932
> 11.3757530 -0.139770
> 5.4069740 -0.089862
> 1.4659270 0.204669
> 0.5980800 0.321169
> 0.0887900 -0.657043
> 0.0353180 -0.474893
> 2 1 1 6 0 1 # Gauss type functions l=1 set 1 (3p orbital)
> 31.8898680 0.004658
> 8.2371780 -0.119249
> 4.3283730 0.125195
> 1.5405260 0.620704
> 0.5280810 0.416780
> 0.0899620 0.014015
> 2 2 2 5 1 # Gauss type functions l=2 set 1 (3d orbital)
> 22.6804330 0.031628
> 6.8613120 0.153807
> 2.2754450 0.378661
> 0.7319220 0.507276
> 0.2007460 0.275921
>
> CP2K starts normally but exit with error message:
> CPASSERT failed qs_mo_types.F:295
> By checking source code I have error here:
> CPASSERT(nmo >= nomo)
>
> Could someone kindly give a working example for force calculations with
> ECP potential.
>
> Many thx in advance,
> Eugene
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/a65b2506-cc62-475b-8514-3ad646aea6a3n%40googlegroups.com.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/32e8d80d-d886-4a51-b040-de7a787533a3n%40googlegroups.com
> .
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/861528b6-98f9-4104-abf4-99e3a61afad3n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220208/de0a624e/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list