[CP2K-user] [CP2K:16268] How to test the band gap of hybrid functional calculation
ma455...@gmail.com
ma455173220 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 18 09:46:31 UTC 2021
Dear Martin,
Thanks for your help! These information are super helpful! I will have a
look of these referecens.
Best Regards,
Hongyang
在2021年11月18日星期四 UTC+11 下午8:04:16<konop... at gmail.com> 写道:
> Dear Hongyang,
>
> As far as I know, a viable way in CP2K is really to do Gamma-point
> calculations in big supercells. This may look to be expensive but CP2K
> offers the TC-LRC and the ADMM techniques; see especially
> [M. Guidon, J. Hutter, J. VandeVondele: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 3010
> (2009)],
> [M. Guidon, J. Hutter, J. VandeVondele: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6, 2348
> (2010)].
> I recommend you to have a look also at several exercises and examples on
> the CP2K site. In my jobs, hybrid-DFT calculations with these techniques
> were running about 2 times slower only comparing to PBE calculations with
> the same basis sets.
>
> I know also about papers
> [C. M. Yim et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 116402 (2016) - see also its
> supplement. info],
> [A. R. Elmaslmane, M. B. Watkins, K.P. McKenna: J. Chem. Theory Comput.
> 14, 3740 (2018)],
> [J.C. Carey, K.P. McKenna: J. Phys. Chem. 122, 27540 (2018)]
> which you may find very convenient.
>
> Best regards
> Martin.
>
> št 18. 11. 2021 o 0:30 ma455... at gmail.com <ma455... at gmail.com> napísal(a):
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm a newbie of cp2k. I came from VASP. When using hybrid functional,
>> such as B3LYP, to perform a calculation, sometime the default B3LYP will
>> overestimate the band gap. In this case, we need to manually reduce the
>> hartree fock mixed in the functional to reproduce the most accurate band
>> gap value. This is much more important when using CP2K, because for
>> different basis sets, different percentage of hartree fock is needed.
>> However, in VASP, we can perform a multiple k-points calculation for
>> primitive cell with different percentage of hartree fock mixed. Then my
>> question is how could we perform this test in CP2K. I think cp2k doesn't
>> support multiple k-points calculation for hybrid functional. Then should we
>> have to perform this type of calculation on large supercell with single
>> k-point?
>>
>> Best,
>> Hongyang
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/6f06e64e-d772-4264-be88-aa5fd17dc8c0n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/6f06e64e-d772-4264-be88-aa5fd17dc8c0n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b23f0db3-b72b-470b-b1c5-bf9535ff354fn%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20211118/767266ea/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list