[CP2K-user] convergence problem
ma...@gmail.com
ma455... at gmail.com
Mon May 31 06:55:44 UTC 2021
Hi,
I think 1E-06 for "MAX_DR MAX_FORCE RMS_DR RMS_FORCE are too tight".
1/3 of the default value of cp2k should be tight enough.
Regards,
Hongyang
在2021年5月31日星期一 UTC+10 上午7:09:07<alberto> 写道:
> Dear cp2k users,
> I am doing the geometry optimization of a configuration (supercell
> containing 4 molecules of Fe(CO)5 with symmetry C2/c and Z=4) but the
> energy is locked on a value and is not decreasing.
> How can I solve this problem?
> Should I use a higher CUTOFF value?
>
>
> *******************************************************************************
> *** BRENT - NUMBER OF ENERGY EVALUATIONS : 1
> ***
>
> *******************************************************************************
>
> -------- Informations at step = 186 ------------
> Optimization Method = SD
> Total Energy = -927.5280017548
> Real energy change = 0.0000000000
> Decrease in energy = NO
> Used time = 2410.831
>
> Convergence check :
> Max. step size = 0.0000000000
> Conv. limit for step size = 0.0000010000
> Convergence in step size = YES
> RMS step size = 0.0000000000
> Conv. limit for RMS step = 0.0000010000
> Convergence in RMS step = YES
> Max. gradient = 0.0089297310
> Conv. limit for gradients = 0.0000010000
> Conv. for gradients = NO
> RMS gradient = 0.0016280805
> Conv. limit for RMS grad. = 0.0000010000
> Conv. for gradients = NO
> ---------------------------------------------------
> I attach the input
> Thanks
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210530/e7af2120/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list