[CP2K-user] [CP2K:15405] Re: Dipole correction vacuum abort

Lenard Carroll lenardc... at gmail.com
Mon May 17 16:15:32 UTC 2021


Matt is correct, I have done a few dipole correction calculations and it
only seems to work once you use a converged non-dipole correction structure.

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:47 PM Matt W <mattwa... at gmail.com> wrote:

> Only comment is to always start from a converged calculation without the
> correction applied.
>
> On Monday, May 17, 2021 at 2:36:20 PM UTC+1 cp... at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been attempting to calculate a few thin films between 1nm and 5nm
>> in thickness but I often get moments during the optimization cycles where
>> the dipole correction that I enforce aborts the calculation.
>>
>> I find this incredibly odd given that the amount of vacuum to offset this
>> error I have recently applied is 50 A.
>>
>> My current compilation where I have discovered this issue is cp2k 6.1,
>> and I have encountered this across a few materials.
>>
>> Any ideas on how to solve these issues? I can provide more details upon
>> request.
>>
>> Christopher
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/400ed04e-4db6-4163-9674-ae23c8b8dd59n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/400ed04e-4db6-4163-9674-ae23c8b8dd59n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210517/1e80b748/attachment.htm>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list