[CP2K-user] [CP2K:15385] Unreasonable CELL_OPT result obtained for TiO2

[Krack Matthias (PSI)]

Hi Yike

Your simulation cell is small and you use no k point sampling. Either you use k point sampling or you enlarge your simulation cell to at least a cell edge length of 12 A in each direction. I suggest the latter option for CP2K. Furthermore, you could reduce EPS_DEFAULT to 1.0E-12 and increase REL_CUTOFF to 60.

HTH

Matthias

Von: cp... at googlegroups.com <cp... at googlegroups.com> Im Auftrag von Yike Huang
Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. Mai 2021 18:23
An: cp2k <cp... at googlegroups.com>
Betreff: [CP2K:15385] Unreasonable CELL_OPT result obtained for TiO2

Hello, cp2k developers and users,

I try to optimize primitive cell of rutile TiO2 by running CELL_OPT calculation at PBE+U(presently set to 0 eV)/DZVP level, but I find cell parameters deviate from experimental values quite quickly during calculation.
I have tried changing STRESS_TENSOR to both NUMERICAL and ANALYTICAL but it does not help, I also think it may be not the reason why I get this kind of strange result.
I attach my input script and CIF file below, are there any parameters in input script I forget?
In addition, anatase TiO2 CELL_OPT task also has such problem, but I remember that primitive cell of Co3O4 can be successfully optimized.

Thanks in advance.

Yike Huang
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/11f85e5a-b3f6-45b2-b164-11f12644f358n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/11f85e5a-b3f6-45b2-b164-11f12644f358n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210516/fe7d863c/attachment.htm>