[CP2K-user] problem with the convergence criteria
alberto
albesan... at gmail.com
Thu May 13 10:34:04 UTC 2021
Dear cp2k users,
I am doing the geometry optimization of a configuration (supercell
containing 4 molecules of Fe(CO)5 with symmetry C2/c and Z=4) but the
energy is locked on a value and is not decreasing, hence the Conv criterion
By gradients = NO.
How can I solve this problem?
Should I use a higher CUTOFF value?
*******************************************************************************
*** BRENT - NUMBER OF ENERGY EVALUATIONS : 1
***
*******************************************************************************
-------- Informations at step = 186 ------------
Optimization Method = SD
Total Energy = -927.5280017548
Real energy change = 0.0000000000
Decrease in energy = NO
Used time = 2410.831
Convergence check :
Max. step size = 0.0000000000
Conv. limit for step size = 0.0000010000
Convergence in step size = YES
RMS step size = 0.0000000000
Conv. limit for RMS step = 0.0000010000
Convergence in RMS step = YES
Max. gradient = 0.0089297310
Conv. limit for gradients = 0.0000010000
Conv. for gradients = NO
RMS gradient = 0.0016280805
Conv. limit for RMS grad. = 0.0000010000
Conv. for gradients = NO
---------------------------------------------------
I attach the input
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210513/697c3661/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: FeCO5.Geo_Opt_cutoff400_BLYP_single_cell.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 3643 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210513/697c3661/attachment.inp>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list