[CP2K-user] [CP2K:14854] Re: Severe deformation of structure during geometry optimization
Lucas Lodeiro
eluni... at gmail.com
Tue Mar 2 16:03:35 UTC 2021
Yes, and in &CELL too, to avoid interaction between slab replicas and their
electrostatic fields.
El mar, 2 mar 2021 a las 12:07, Lenard Carroll (<lenardc... at gmail.com>)
escribió:
> Just to be 100% clear, are you saying that for the &POISSON section which
> deals with the electrostatic potential, that I select PERIODIC XY?
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:55 PM Lucas Lodeiro <eluni... at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just a comment, see your electrostatic potential profile. You are using a
>> periodical slab picture, then when you add a polar molecule, there is not a
>> flat potential into the vacuum, in that case, disable the periodicity in
>> this direction or add an electrostatic field to correct it.
>> Also, to check the convergence of your quantities with respect to your
>> model, you could explore bigger slabs than 6 layers.
>>
>> Regards - Lucas Lodeiro
>>
>> El mar, 2 mar 2021 a las 6:37, ASSIDUO Network (<
>> lenardc... at gmail.com>) escribió:
>>
>>> Thank you for the quick response.
>>>
>>> I understand what you are saying and it makes total sense to me. Thank
>>> you for clarifying.
>>>
>>> The 3x3x1 was just to test how my final adsorption energy changes when I
>>> change various settings, including alpha, beta, kpoints and cutoff. I got
>>> similar results to the the 5x5x1 case, however the 5x5x1 result was more
>>> accurate compared to the ltierature.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 11:33:40 AM UTC+2 fa... at gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Lenard,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you have correctly answered your question. For metals you need a
>>>> quite good sampling of the brillouin zone. Therefore a gamma-point
>>>> calculation of a 5x5 angstrom unit cell is expected to yield unreasonable
>>>> results.
>>>> The fact that you managed to get a good structure with a cutoff of 300
>>>> is probably due to a coincidental error cancelling. But as soon as you
>>>> alter the configuration by adding a CO the error cancelling does not work
>>>> anymore and the structure becomes unreasonable again.
>>>>
>>>> You should make sure that your quantity of interest is converged w.r.t
>>>> the size of the k-point grid. 3x3x1still seems small to me, but maybe its
>>>> already enough for you.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Fabian
>>>> On Tuesday, 2 March 2021 at 06:42:45 UTC+1 ASSIDUO Network wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi there everyone, I am currently trying to geometry optimize a stack
>>>>> of Au (111) 2x2 surfaces, specifically by fixing the bottom 3 surfaces and
>>>>> relaxing the top 3.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, the top surfaces completely mess up and the final
>>>>> structure looks bad. When I turn KPOINTS on (3x3x1 or 5x5x1), it no longer
>>>>> happens.
>>>>> Finally, when I lower the cutoff to 300, but I leave KPOINTS off, I
>>>>> get a good optimized geometry, but when I try to perform a CO adsorption
>>>>> with that optimized structure, it severely deforms as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have a solution to my problem, particularly one that
>>>>> doesn't change the ELECTRONIC_TEMPERATURE, KPOINTS or CUTOFF. Is it the
>>>>> need for KPOINTS in a small structure like this that messes up the results?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have attached all my relevant files.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Lenard
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/d1100c7c-514e-4fbc-82e5-528bcdad45abn%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/d1100c7c-514e-4fbc-82e5-528bcdad45abn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAOFT4PJSHNzMu9F08E0UO-rBJZJO7puF6Z9UMUxQDxzu10L_bA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAOFT4PJSHNzMu9F08E0UO-rBJZJO7puF6Z9UMUxQDxzu10L_bA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAKur158Q1dvprpLA5QyzBVSMy1qJd14oxfFPUaFygaKF2TcYBA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAKur158Q1dvprpLA5QyzBVSMy1qJd14oxfFPUaFygaKF2TcYBA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210302/eff61b30/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list