[CP2K-user] about QS / DDAPC_RESTRAINT
Sun Geng
gengs... at gmail.com
Wed Jan 20 20:53:23 UTC 2021
Dear CP2K users,
Is there any rule of thumb for choosing the CDFT vs DDAPC_RESTRAINT under
CP2K/DFT/QS?
They seem to be very similar in the purpose, but DDAPC_RESTRAINT is much
easier to set up (only a few parameters).
Can someone give a few high-level comments? In particular, if I want to get
the localized hole in an exemplary Ag2O oxide.
Thank you very much in advance.
Best Regards,
Geng
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210120/6766f49a/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list