[CP2K-user] [CP2K:13871] Need advice on bulk metal system calculations
Marcella Iannuzzi
marci... at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 15:01:28 UTC 2020
Dear Stephen
Are you sure about
ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 60 60 60
Best regards
Marcella
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 4:22:21 PM UTC+2 Stephen wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Thanks for your input! Using the CP2K example 'Getting the band structure
> of graphene' (
> https://www.cp2k.org/exercises:2016_uzh_cmest:band_structure_calculation),
> I was able to add the KPOINT section into my current input shown above.
> I've been altering the parameters and playing around with the input file,
> but I'm having issues troubleshooting why my new input isn't working
> properly. The CP2K example was able to run, but my job isn't which makes
> me think there is an issue with some of the other flags I've set in my .inp
> file for bulk Cu.
>
> Below you can find the new .inp file that I've been using. Thanks for
> taking a look!
>
> With much appreciation,
>
> Stephen
>
> &GLOBAL
> PRINT_LEVEL MEDIUM
> PROJECT_NAME bulk-Cu-CELL_DIMA
> RUN_TYPE ENERGY_FORCE
> WALLTIME 23:40:00
> &END GLOBAL
> &FORCE_EVAL
> METHOD QS
> STRESS_TENSOR ANALYTICAL
>
> &DFT
> BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME BASIS_file
> POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME POTENTIALS_file
> UKS T
> MULTIPLICITY 2
> CHARGE 0
> &SCF
> MAX_SCF 1000
> EPS_SCF 9.9999999999999995E-07
> SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
> &OT T
> MINIMIZER CG
> PRECONDITIONER FULL_ALL
> ENERGY_GAP 1.0000000000000000E-03
> &END OT
> &OUTER_SCF T
> EPS_SCF 9.9999999999999995E-07
> MAX_SCF 50
> &END OUTER_SCF
> &END SCF
> &QS
> EPS_DEFAULT 1.0000000000000000E-10
> METHOD GPW
> EXTRAPOLATION USE_GUESS
>
> &END QS
> &MGRID
> NGRIDS 5
> CUTOFF 3.6000000000000000E+02
> REL_CUTOFF 8.0000000000000000E+01
> &END MGRID
> &XC
> DENSITY_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
> GRADIENT_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
> TAU_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
> &XC_FUNCTIONAL NO_SHORTCUT
> &PBE T
> &END PBE
> &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
> &VDW_POTENTIAL
> POTENTIAL_TYPE PAIR_POTENTIAL
> &PAIR_POTENTIAL
> TYPE DFTD3(BJ)
> PARAMETER_FILE_NAME dftd3.dat
> REFERENCE_FUNCTIONAL PBE
> CALCULATE_C9_TERM F
> &END PAIR_POTENTIAL
> &END VDW_POTENTIAL
> &END XC
> &KPOINTS
> SCHEME MONKHORST-PACK 1 1 1
> SYMMETRY OFF
> WAVEFUNCTIONS REAL
> FULL_GRID .TRUE.
> PARALLEL_GROUP_SIZE 0
> &END KPOINTS
> &END DFT
> &SUBSYS
> &CELL
> ABC 2.24 2.24 2.24
> ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 60 60 60
> MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL 1 1 1
> &END CELL
> &TOPOLOGY
> COORD_FILE_FORMAT CIF
> COORD_FILE_NAME bulk-Cu.cif
> NUMBER_OF_ATOMS 1
> MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL 1 1 1
> &END TOPOLOGY
> &KIND Cu
> BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH-q11
> POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q11
> &END KIND
> &END SUBSYS
> &PRINT
> &FORCES ON
> &END FORCES
> &END PRINT
> &END FORCE_EVAL
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:27 AM Krack Matthias (PSI) <mat... at psi.ch>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephen
>>
>>
>>
>> For the description of metallic bulk systems, you will need Brillouin
>> zone sampling with an appropriate k point mesh. It seems this is missing in
>> your input.
>>
>>
>>
>> HTH
>>
>>
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* c... at googlegroups.com <c... at googlegroups.com> *On Behalf Of *
>> Stephen
>> *Sent:* Montag, 14. September 2020 14:54
>> *To:* cp2k <c... at googlegroups.com>
>> *Subject:* [CP2K:13869] Need advice on bulk metal system calculations
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone has tips for computing bulk metallic system in
>> CP2K (specifically for bulk Cu and bulk Ni system). I need the electronic
>> energy for bulk Cu and bulk Ni for some modeling on NP thermodynamic
>> stability.
>>
>>
>>
>> I've optimized the unit cell parameters for both Cu and Ni systems by
>> varying the unit cell dimensions found on Materials Project
>> <https://materialsproject.org/materials/mp-30/> with the same level of
>> theory as my CP2K on metal-organic frameworks. When I try to compute
>> different metallic properties though such as atomization and bulk Cu + O2
>> (g) --> bulk CuO my energies are way off..
>>
>> From Web Elements for Ni
>> <https://www.webelements.com/copper/thermochemistry.html>, the
>> atomization energy was determined:
>>
>> bulk Cu (s) --> Cu(0) (g) w/ deltaH=338 kJ/mol
>>
>>
>> Now using DFT, the follow atomisation energy was determined to be:
>>
>> bulk Cu (s) --> Cu(0) (g) w/ deltaE=1658.2 kJ/mol
>>
>>
>>
>> Either my bulk system is too stable, or my atomized Cu is too unstable.
>> Here is my DFT section for the bulk Cu calculations.
>>
>>
>>
>> &DFT
>>
>> BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME BASIS_file
>>
>> POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME POTENTIALS_file
>>
>> UKS T
>>
>> MULTIPLICITY 2
>>
>> CHARGE 0
>>
>> &SCF
>>
>> MAX_SCF 1000
>>
>> EPS_SCF 9.9999999999999995E-07
>>
>> SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
>>
>> &OT T
>>
>> MINIMIZER CG
>>
>> PRECONDITIONER FULL_ALL
>>
>> ENERGY_GAP 1.0000000000000000E-03
>>
>> &END OT
>>
>> &OUTER_SCF T
>>
>> EPS_SCF 9.9999999999999995E-07
>>
>> MAX_SCF 50
>>
>> &END OUTER_SCF
>>
>> &END SCF
>>
>> &QS
>>
>> EPS_DEFAULT 1.0000000000000000E-10
>>
>> METHOD GPW
>>
>> &END QS
>>
>> &MGRID
>>
>> NGRIDS 5
>>
>> CUTOFF 3.6000000000000000E+02
>>
>> REL_CUTOFF 8.0000000000000000E+01
>>
>> &END MGRID
>>
>> &XC
>>
>> DENSITY_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
>>
>> GRADIENT_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
>>
>> TAU_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
>>
>> &XC_FUNCTIONAL NO_SHORTCUT
>>
>> &PBE T
>>
>> &END PBE
>>
>> &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
>>
>> &VDW_POTENTIAL
>>
>> POTENTIAL_TYPE PAIR_POTENTIAL
>>
>> &PAIR_POTENTIAL
>>
>> TYPE DFTD3(BJ)
>>
>> PARAMETER_FILE_NAME dftd3.dat
>>
>> REFERENCE_FUNCTIONAL PBE
>>
>> CALCULATE_C9_TERM F
>>
>> &END PAIR_POTENTIAL
>>
>> &END VDW_POTENTIAL
>>
>> &END XC
>>
>> &END DFT
>>
>>
>>
>> Sample .inp and .out files are attached.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any feedback would be much appreciated! Thanks for taking a look at my
>> issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> With much appreciation,
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/a3f838aa-94cb-4998-b501-09656b8efd2en%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/a3f838aa-94cb-4998-b501-09656b8efd2en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/cp2k/g7wXQbqxfQs/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> cp... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/734dfa8497b94d2fb178deb4655bfee5%40psi.ch
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/734dfa8497b94d2fb178deb4655bfee5%40psi.ch?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
>
> --
> *Stephen P. Vicchio*
> PhD Candidate | Getman Research Group
> Dept. of Education GAANN Fellow
> Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
> <https://www.clemson.edu/cecas/departments/chbe/>
> 105 Earle Hall | Clemson, SC 29634-0909
> s... at g.clemson.edu
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200915/b9b77342/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list