[CP2K-user] [CP2K:13056] COF cell optimize exploded
Linfeng Gan
linfe... at gmail.com
Thu May 14 10:48:20 UTC 2020
I had carefully tested the CUTOFF and the CELL_REF. The test results showed
that increased the CUTOFF had most helpful.
So, the problem solved
On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 4:11:46 PM UTC+8, Linfeng Gan wrote:
>
> Thanks Juerg. I will try as you suggest and update a few days later.
>
>
> On Monday, April 6, 2020 at 3:32:56 PM UTC+8, jgh wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I assume your system is weakly bound in z-direction. Small force
>> changes in that direction can cause large changes.
>> The only obvious problem I could spot is the definition of the
>> reference cell. In order to minimize the effect of a change in
>> volume, the reference cell should be larger than the initial
>> and final cell. I would set c=10 or 12 and I would also increase
>> the cutoff.
>> You could test this by just scan the energy as function of c and
>> correctly adapt the geometry of course.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Juerg Hutter
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
>> Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
>> Universität Zürich E-mail: h... at chem.uzh.ch
>> Winterthurerstrasse 190
>> CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -----c... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
>> To: "cp2k" <c... at googlegroups.com>
>> From: "Linfeng Gan"
>> Sent by: c... at googlegroups.com
>> Date: 04/05/2020 04:27AM
>> Subject: [CP2K:13056] COF cell optimize exploded
>>
>>
>> Hello all,
>> I need some help about the covalent-organic frameworks (COF) 2D sheet
>> cell optimize. After I optimized the COF with a 2X2X2 supercell, the cell
>> size was totally exploded. I had kept the cell vectors and symmetry
>> constant, changed different basis sets and different XC functions but the
>> cell exploded anyway.
>> I had tried basis sets DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH and DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH with
>> PADE, PBE and BLYP. And the DFTD3 correction was also add to each
>> calculation. The GAPW method I also had tried, but none of them worked.
>>
>> Any suggestion is welcome, thanks!
>> Linfeng
>>
>> The COF-5-2X2X2 supercell vectors should be:
>> CELL_TOP| Volume [angstrom^3]:
>> 21253.270
>> CELL_TOP| Vector a [angstrom 60.040 0.000 0.000 |a| =
>> 60.040
>> CELL_TOP| Vector b [angstrom -30.020 51.996 0.000 |b| =
>> 60.040
>> CELL_TOP| Vector c [angstrom 0.000 0.000 6.808 |c| =
>> 6.808
>> CELL_TOP| Angle (b,c), alpha [degree]:
>> 90.000
>> CELL_TOP| Angle (a,c), beta [degree]:
>> 90.000
>> CELL_TOP| Angle (a,b), gamma [degree]:
>> 120.000
>>
>> But after cell optimized calculation the output cell vectors are:
>>
>> *******************************************************************************
>>
>> *** GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION COMPLETED
>> ***
>>
>> *******************************************************************************
>>
>>
>> Reevaluating energy at the minimum
>>
>> CELL| Volume [angstrom^3]:
>> 25653.623
>> CELL| Vector a [angstrom]: 60.345 0.000 0.000 |a| =
>> 60.345
>> CELL| Vector b [angstrom]: -30.173 52.260 0.000 |b| =
>> 60.345
>> CELL| Vector c [angstrom]: 0.000 -0.000 8.135 |c| =
>> 8.135
>> CELL| Angle (b,c), alpha [degree]:
>> 90.000
>> CELL| Angle (a,c), beta [degree]:
>> 90.000
>> CELL| Angle (a,b), gamma [degree]:
>> 120.000
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to c... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/2da4af3b-2dcf-46c3-a49e-3dc62b170405%40googlegroups.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> [attachment "COF-5-2X2X2.xyz" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
>> [attachment "opt_cell.inp" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200514/d80368fd/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list