[CP2K-user] Very strange behavior of CI-NEB calculations
Jacob Jensen
Neutr... at gmail.com
Tue Feb 4 13:18:40 UTC 2020
Thank you Travis,
I didn't know that at all. Re-ordering indeed solved the problem.
Have a good day,
Jacob
On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 2:00:01 PM UTC+1, Travis wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The atoms have to have the same ordering in i.xyz and f.xyz. You have NCH
> in one and NHC in the other.
>
> -T
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 7:37:46 AM UTC-5, Jacob Jensen wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm doing CI-NEB calculations for a set of reactions on different metal
>> surfaces. During my calculations I encountered a very bizarre behavior of
>> the code which I haven't been able to find a reason for it.
>> The problem is: I give starting (i.xyz) and end points (f.xyz) to the
>> CP2K to do a simple CI-NEB calculation, but in a completely random way
>> (only happens to some reactions) the code exchanges the last two lines of
>> the final configuration (f.xyz) and starts the calculation with wrong
>> coordinates. It has happened also for more than two lines in some
>> structures.
>>
>> For instance in the coordinates provided below, "tail f.xyz" shows this:
>>
>> Cu 2.5607522840 3.6179848259 10.2114493134
>> Cu 5.1090632775 3.6199416787 10.2213122857
>> Cu 7.6670721044 3.6155408617 10.2040766974
>> Cu 0.0000430330 7.2313188455 10.2023231891
>> Cu 2.5586830958 7.2299962241 10.2055589609
>> Cu 5.1117660386 7.2291476249 10.2075861138
>> Cu 7.6675778217 7.2313677337 10.2036234566
>> N 6.0791607429 5.3490729602 14.3227064450
>> C 5.1523694228 5.0243296300 14.0410514879
>> H 4.1418019657 4.6566468208 13.6463880308
>>
>> But once the job starts to run, CP2K exchanges the last two atoms (C and
>> H) and starts with:
>>
>>
>> NEB|***************************************************************************
>> NEB| Geometry for Replica Nr. 2 in Angstrom
>> NEB| Cu 1.278231000 1.807692000 1.278231000
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> NEB| Cu 5.112380330 -0.000210681 10.202471653
>> NEB| Cu 7.667615495 -0.000585929 10.201760866
>> NEB| Cu 0.000556842 3.615646368 10.203009475
>> NEB| Cu 2.560752284 3.617984826 10.211449313
>> NEB| Cu 5.109063277 3.619941679 10.221312286
>> NEB| Cu 7.667072104 3.615540862 10.204076697
>> NEB| Cu 0.000043033 7.231318845 10.202323189
>> NEB| Cu 2.558683096 7.229996224 10.205558961
>> NEB| Cu 5.111766039 7.229147625 10.207586114
>> NEB| Cu 7.667577822 7.231367734 10.203623457
>> NEB| N 6.079160743 5.349072960 14.322706445
>> NEB| H 5.152369423 5.024329630 14.041051488
>> NEB| C 4.141801966 4.656646821 13.646388031
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> This happens without any error or warning and as you can imagine, the
>> result of this calculation would be nothing but garbage. I have provided my
>> input file, initial and final configurations together with the required
>> basis sets and pseudopotentials to provide a possibility of simple test run
>> (even with one core, cause the interpolation is at the very beginning of
>> the output file).
>>
>> I would be grateful if you can take a look and let me know about the
>> possible reason. Or if you have had the same experience with other
>> structures that would be beneficial for me to know.
>>
>> I have tried with different versions of CP2K (e.g. 5.1 and 7.0) and the
>> result is the same. Also, whenever I change i.xyz to f.xyz in :
>>
>> &TOPOLOGY
>> COORD_FILE_FORMAT XYZ
>> COORD_FILE_NAME i.xyz
>> &END,
>>
>> the same exchange of lines happens to i.xyz and final replica (f.xyz)
>> stays intact! This really baffles me a lot.
>>
>> Any remark or sharing of experience is highly appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Jacob Jensen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200204/a38d056a/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list