[CP2K-user] CP2K 7.1-Cuda Bandgap and HF energies different from previous versions
Andres Ortega
oandr... at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 14:47:18 UTC 2020
Dear CP2K developers,
I was wondering if you could help me with something,
I have used CP2K 5.1 and 6.1 for PBE0-TC-LRC calculations in the past.
I have found that my Bandgap values are consistent in versions 5.1 and 6.1
in our local cluster.
I did calculations with the versions 6.1 and 7.1 with Cuda in Piz Daint,
and I have found that my Bandgaps are around -0.25 eV different and the HF
energies (and total energies) are now different
There is no difference using a restart wfn file or optimizing the SCF cycle
from the beginning.
best,
Andres Ortega
LSMO EPFL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200429/ad9f6554/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pbe0.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 5346 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200429/ad9f6554/attachment.inp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test.subsys-pbe0
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200429/ad9f6554/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pbe0_5.1_6.1_values.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 503895 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200429/ad9f6554/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pbe0_6.1_7.1_cuda.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 227808 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200429/ad9f6554/attachment-0002.obj>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list