[CP2K-user] Problems with RPBE
Wan-Lu Li
wanlu... at gmail.com
Thu Nov 28 06:35:35 UTC 2019
Dear CP2K users,
I'm wondering if I implemented RPBE right or not. I compared the
inter-molecular interaction of water dimers using B97M_rV and RPBE
functionals. But I found that the binding energy difference is quiet large.
The energy based on B97M_rV is 5.19 kcal/mol, while RPBE is only 1.65
kcal/mol. I'm sure the B97M_rV result is correct. So why RPBE underestimate
the energy quite large. I attach the input for RPBE (one water) here,
please help me check it. Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Wanlu
&FORCE_EVAL
METHOD QS
&DFT
BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME BASIS_MOLOPT
POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME GTH_POTENTIALS
&MGRID
CUTOFF 1200
REL_CUTOFF 60
&END MGRID
&QS
EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-12
&END QS
&SCF
EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
&OT ON
MINIMIZER DIIS
&END OT
&OUTER_SCF ON
MAX_SCF 5
EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
&END OUTER_SCF
&END SCF
&XC
&XC_FUNCTIONAL
&LIBXC
FUNCTIONAL GGA_X_RPBE
&END LIBXC
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&XC_GRID
XC_DERIV NN50_SMOOTH
&END XC_GRID
&END XC
&POISSON
PERIODIC none
POISSON_SOLVER wavelet
&END POISSON
&END DFT
&SUBSYS
&CELL
ABC 20.0 20.0 20.0
ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.0 90.0 90.0
PERIODIC NONE
&END CELL
&COORD
O 1.350625 0.111469 0.000000
H 1.680398 -0.373741 -0.758561
H 1.680398 -0.373741 0.758561
&END COORD
&TOPOLOGY
&CENTER_COORDINATES
&END CENTER_COORDINATES
&END TOPOLOGY
&KIND O
BASIS_SET TZVP-MOLOPT-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q6
&END KIND
&KIND H
BASIS_SET TZVP-MOLOPT-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q1
&END KIND
&END SUBSYS
&END FORCE_EVAL
&GLOBAL
PROJECT Dimer_SP
RUN_TYPE Energy
&END GLOBAL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20191127/9d6d5b84/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list