[CP2K-user] Regression test: how to check test result of wat_mode_sel_range.inp when np=1 or 2
vitesse lin
vites... at gmail.com
Tue Nov 12 08:47:39 UTC 2019
Dear all,
We run regression test two times with different number of processes under
the same folder.
For the first time, np=1 and regress test reported wat_mode_sel_range.inp
was a NEW one:
*wat_mode_sel_range.inp
1736.718534 NEW ( 9.61 sec)*
For second time, np=2 and regress test reported these:
*wat_mode_sel_range.inp
7.162315 WRONG RESULT TEST 18*
*…*
*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*
* /home/mpich-ucx/TEST-local_cpu-psmp-2019-11-04_01-56-
07/Fist/regtest-5-vib/wat_mode_sel_range.inp.out : MS| TRACKED FREQUENCY :
old = 1736.718534 new = 7.162315 relative error : 2.41480055e+02 >
numerical tolerance = 7e-08
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*
To investigate this WRONG issue, we run wat_mode_sel_range.inp
independently.
When np=1, it reported:
*MS| TRACKED FREQUENCY (1) IS: 1736.718534 cm-1*
When np=2, it reported:
*MS| TRACKED FREQUENCY (1) IS: 1736.709744 cm-1*
* MS| TRACKED FREQUENCY (2) IS: 7.162315 cm-1*
So our questions are:
Did np=2 get reasonable results?
Is it reasonable to compare *TRACKED FREQUENCY (1) of np=1* with *TRACKED
FREQUENCY (2) of np=2* to check if wat_mode_sel_range.inp gets the right
result or not?
Thanks,
Vitesse.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20191112/ebfbdb54/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list