[CP2K-user] [CP2K:11393] Convergence difference with different number of pocessors for an input
Matthias Krack
matthia... at psi.ch
Sun Mar 10 09:26:42 UTC 2019
Hi
how many CPU cores do you have available?
There are also issues with your input: (1) you set PERIODIC NONE only for
Poisson solver, but not in the CELL section, (2) EPS_DEFAULT should be at
least 1.0E-12, (3) you should try alternative PSOLVERs like MT or WAVELET
instead of MULTIPOLE.
HTH
Matthias
On Friday, 8 March 2019 22:19:39 UTC+1, Mohammad Shakiba wrote:
>
> Dear Matthias Krack,
>
> As you said I added OMP_NUM_THREADS to mpirun as follows:
>
> 'mpirun -np 16 -genv OMP_NUM_THREADS 1'
>
> I did that for one thread for different number of processors 4, 16 and 32.
> For 32 it could not perform even one OT after half an hour. The outputs of
> the three runs done for some minutes are attached. Also, I found that the
> version of CP2K is 7. Should I use another version?
>
>
> On Friday, March 8, 2019 at 10:47:01 PM UTC+3:30, Matthias Krack wrote:
>>
>> Hi ?
>>
>>
>>
>> The extension “.psmp” implies that you are using an MPI and OpenMP
>> parallel cp2k executable. Did you define the number of OpenMP threads at
>> runtime, e.g. by setting the environment variable OMP_NUM_THREADS? OpenMP
>> usually behaves greedy, if you do not specify the number of threads, i.e.
>> it might create for each MPI process a number OpenMP threads equivalent to
>> the number of available CPU cores, which will easily overload your compute
>> node. This could explain the weird timings, but there might be other
>> reasons as well. You will have to provide a corresponding output file, if
>> you want to have better guesses as an answer.
>>
>>
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cp... at googlegroups.com <cp... at googlegroups.com> *On Behalf Of *Mohammad
>> Shakiba
>> *Sent:* Freitag, 8. März 2019 19:43
>> *To:* cp2k <cp... at googlegroups.com>
>> *Subject:* [CP2K:11393] Convergence difference with different number of
>> pocessors for an input
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> I was using CP2K 6.1.0, compiled with intel 17 and 'psmp' version, for ab
>> initio molecular dynamics. My system contains 87 atoms containing Al, O, C
>> and H (an MOF). I had two major questions, please help me to find their
>> answers.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1- When I use 16 number of processors, it takes 2.5 seconds for each OT
>> calculation and when I use 4 processors it takes 2.9 seconds to update OT.
>> When I put the number of processors to 20 it takes 270 seconds (about 5
>> minutes), put it for 40 it takes 140 seconds and if I put it for 12
>> processors it takes more than a minute for each update. My question here is
>> just WHY? the following questions are:
>>
>> Is there an optimum number of processors? How can I define that? When
>> should we use a high number of processors? I have used command 'mpirun -np
>> $nprocessors cp2k.psmp -i $input -o $output'.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2- I used 16 number of processors and 4 number of processors. For 'mpirun
>> -np 16', it does not converge but for 'mpirun -np 4' it converges slightly
>> to the target convergence. I have changed the following commands but the
>> convergence for 16 number of processors did not change. Can you explain
>> why? What would be the solution to obtain convergence for 16 number of
>> processors?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>>
>> I summarize the commands in the attached input file:
>>
>>
>>
>> RUN_TYPE MD
>>
>>
>>
>> !FORCE_EVAL
>>
>> METHOD Quickstep
>>
>>
>>
>> !QS
>>
>> METHOD GPW
>>
>>
>>
>> EXTRAPOLATION ASPC
>>
>>
>>
>> PERIODIC NONE
>>
>>
>>
>> PSOLVER MULTIPOLE
>>
>>
>>
>> SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
>>
>>
>>
>> EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
>>
>>
>>
>> PRECONDITIONER FULL_SINGLE_INVERSE ! I also used FULL_ALL
>>
>>
>>
>> MINIMIZER DIIS ! I also used CG but it converges very slightly and
>> sometimes there is no change in the convergence
>>
>>
>>
>> OPTIMIZER BFGS
>>
>>
>>
>> ENSEMBLE NVT
>>
>>
>>
>> TYPE NOSE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20190310/27b4af72/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list