[CP2K-user] [CP2K:11324] Weird "convergence" of L-BFGS CELL_OPT
Krack Matthias (PSI)
matthia... at psi.ch
Fri Feb 22 13:49:58 UTC 2019
Hi Daniele
The SCF runs did not converge in the CP2K output file which you attached. Thus, you are feeding the L-BFGS optimiser with invalid atomic forces.
Though the L-BFGS might get stuck in that way even with valid forces, this can usually be overcome by a restart or by using BFGS if possible.
Matthias
From: cp... at googlegroups.com <cp... at googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Daniele Ongari
Sent: Freitag, 22. Februar 2019 14:39
To: cp2k <cp... at googlegroups.com>
Subject: [CP2K:11324] Weird "convergence" of L-BFGS CELL_OPT
Dear CP2K mailing list,
We experience a strange behavior of the L-BFGS optimization algorithm when dealing with cases where SCF convergence is problematic.
After 20 minimization steps the cp2k printed the following:
-------- Informations at step = 21 ------------
Optimization Method = LBFGS
Total Energy = -2345.6430825804
Internal Pressure [bar] = 23.9760390703
Real energy change = 0.0028283710
Decrease in energy = NO
Used time = 5864.105
Convergence check :
Max. step size = 0.0000000000
Conv. limit for step size = 0.0030000000
Convergence in step size = YES
RMS step size = 0.0000000000
Conv. limit for RMS step = 0.0015000000
Convergence in RMS step = YES
Max. gradient = 0.0082916384
Conv. limit for gradients = 0.0004500000
Conv. for gradients = NO
RMS gradient = 0.0009846623
Conv. limit for RMS grad. = 0.0003000000
Conv. for gradients = NO
Pressure Deviation [bar] = -76.0239609297
Pressure Tolerance [bar] = 100.0000000000
Conv. for PRESSURE = YES
---------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
OPTIMIZATION STEP: 22
--------------------------
***********************************************
* Specific L-BFGS convergence criteria
* WANTED_PROJ_GRADIENT and WANTED_REL_F_ERROR
* satisfied .... run CONVERGED!
***********************************************
The two things that look strange for us are:
1) Max. step size and RMS step size were 'artificially' set to 0.0000000000
2) Not all checks are showing convergence, while L-BFGS algorithm has decided to stop.
Therefore, we would like to know if this is an expected behavior of the L-BFGS algorithm and if yes, what is the reason behind working this way?
Please see input and output files attached.
With best regards,
Daniele and Sasha
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com>.
To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20190222/685785b0/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list