[CP2K-user] how to specify xc functional name in cp2k
Frederick Stein
nwfr... at googlemail.com
Wed Apr 24 08:31:50 UTC 2019
Hi Geng,
Both are correct. CP2K passes the functional name directly to the Libxc
library. They possibly remove "XC_". Due to the change log, I assume that
the prefix has been actively used in former versions and is still kept for
reasons of backwards compatibility.
Best regards.
Frederick
Am Dienstag, 23. April 2019 23:19:58 UTC+2 schrieb Geng Sun:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I wonder how to specify the functional name in CP2K_INPUT
> <https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT.html> / ATOM
> <https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/ATOM.html> / METHOD
> <https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/ATOM/METHOD.html> / XC
> <https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/ATOM/METHOD/XC.html> /
> XC_FUNCTIONAL
> <https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/ATOM/METHOD/XC/XC_FUNCTIONAL.html>
> / LIBXC
> <https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/ATOM/METHOD/XC/XC_FUNCTIONAL/LIBXC.html>
>
> I found that in all the examples under the regest test, the functional
> names startswith an extra "XC_" compared with the functional name from the
> libxc website. Is this required?
> I removed the prefix "XC_" and the CP2K also runs, but I don't know which
> is the right way to do it.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Geng
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20190424/643a5094/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list