[CP2K-user] [CP2K:11509] Re: number of g-vectors for grid

[hut... at chem.uzh.ch]

Hi

I cannot reproduce this behavior. Even with more than 128 MPI
threads, the example proceeds to

  HFX_INFO| Replica ID:                                                        1

I assume you hit the assertion before this point.

I'm running v7.0 with gfortran 5.3 or later.

Juerg
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter                         Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C                FAX   : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich                   E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------

-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: "cp2k" <cp... at googlegroups.com>
From: "Hans Pabst" 
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 04/02/2019 10:44AM
Subject: [CP2K:11509] Re: number of g-vectors for grid

It looks like the node count must a power-of-two or at least everything else between 128 and 256 nodes hits the assertion. If found this to be true down to CP2K 4.1 (I have not checked older releases yet).


Am Sonntag, 31. März 2019 20:57:29 UTC+2 schrieb Hans Pabst:
For a given workload (LiHFX), I was successfully running with 128 nodes (6144 cores). However, with more nodes, CP2K 6.1 release as well as v7.0-dev terminates with a runtime condition where the number of g-vectors of the PW-grid does not meet the following criterion: CPASSERT(pw_grid%ngpts_cut_local == gpt), which is at line #1608 in CP2K/master. I ran with all preferrable node-counts beyond 128, but it always hits the assertion. I understand that one can overdecompose a workload (or otherwise hit a condition that is simply not possible for a given input). However, with LiHFX in particular, there are results published that ran successfully on way more nodes/cores. Given the latter, I wonder if I am trapped by some mistake. Do you have an advice on how to best run this workload? I was already using preferrable rank/thread combinations and of course relying on the hybrid binary (PSMP). Is there an adjustment of LIBINT settings needed (-D__LIBINT_MAX_AM=7 -D__LIBDERIV_MAX_AM1=6 -D__MAX_CONTR=4)?
  
  -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.