cp2k build intel compilers
Stanislav Šimko
stanisl... at gmail.com
Wed Sep 19 18:46:29 UTC 2018
I tried the "-check all -g" flag and I got huge error log that I can not
interpret. Do you have any idea what could be going on?
On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 at 8:01:08 PM UTC+2, Alfio Lazzaro wrote:
>
> Sorry, just to make sure, are you using the 17.0.4?
>
> From your stacktrace:
>
> cp2k.popt 000000000D7A6BDD Unknown Unknown Unknown
> libpthread-2.17.s 00002AD8E6CFB680 Unknown Unknown Unknown
> cp2k.popt 0000000007411331 dbcsr_api_mp_dbcs 795
> dbcsr_api.F
> cp2k.popt 000000000567834C cp_dbcsr_operatio 944
> cp_dbcsr_operations.F
>
> It sees to me that this is a bug with some version of the Intel compiler,
> namely with Optional Pointer dummy arguments...
> Second question, have you tried to run the CP2K regtests?
> One more suggestion: you can use the flags "-check all -g", maybe you can
> get a better error message...
>
>
> Il giorno mercoledì 19 settembre 2018 18:05:46 UTC+2, Stanislav Šimko ha
> scritto:
>>
>> Thank you Alfio for your suggestions. Unfortunately, it is still not
>> working - I compiled only support for fftw3, mkl, mpi (and even without
>> mpi) and I still get the same error. I tried contacting the system admins
>> and I shall see whether they have more luck compiling it. Nevertheless, I'm
>> still open to suggestions.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> On Sunday, September 16, 2018 at 9:32:13 PM UTC+2, Alfio Lazzaro wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Stanislav,
>>> I would suggest starting with a minimal CP2K installation, i.e. without
>>> any major library, lust MKL (with FFTW) and IntelMPI.
>>> An arch file would be:
>>>
>>> CC = cc
>>> CPP =
>>> FC = mpiifort
>>> LD = mpiifort
>>> AR = ar -r
>>>
>>> CPPFLAGS =
>>> DFLAGS = -D__MKL -D__FFTW3 -D__parallel \
>>> -D__SCALAPACK
>>> CFLAGS = $(DFLAGS)
>>> MKLROOT = <path to MKL>
>>> FCFLAGS = $(DFLAGS) -O2 -g -traceback -fpp -free \
>>> -I$(MKLROOT)/include -I$(MKLROOT)/include/fftw
>>> FCFLAGS2 = $(DFLAGS) -O0 -g -traceback -fpp -free \
>>> -I$(MKLROOT)/include -I$(MKLROOT)/include/fftw
>>> LDFLAGS = $(FCFLAGS) -static-intel
>>> LDFLAGS_C = $(FCFLAGS) -static-intel -nofor_main
>>> LIBS = $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_scalapack_lp64.a \
>>> -Wl,--start-group $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_intel_lp64.a \
>>> $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_sequential.a \
>>> $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_core.a \
>>> $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_blacs_intelmpi_lp64.a -Wl,--end-group \
>>> -lpthread -lm
>>>
>>> # Required due to memory leak that occurs if high optimisations are used
>>> mp2_optimize_ri_basis.o: mp2_optimize_ri_basis.F
>>> $(FC) -c $(FCFLAGS2) $<
>>>
>>> Concerning the compiler, please take a look at this page
>>>
>>> https://www.cp2k.org/dev:compiler_support
>>>
>>> Intel 17.0.2 is not tested by CP2K people, so I'm not sure if it works.
>>> It would be better to use 17.0.4 or 18.0.3. They are both well tested...
>>> The best would be to run the CP2K regression test.
>>>
>>> Assuming that everything works fine, then I would move to include other
>>> libraries (libxsmm, ELPA, LIBXC, Libint).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Alfio
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Il giorno domenica 16 settembre 2018 01:33:30 UTC+2, Stanislav Šimko ha
>>> scritto:
>>>>
>>>> Well, it's unfortunately getting a lot messier. I got cp2k compiled on
>>>> 2 machines in the end, but I get bad results. On both machines, I use intel
>>>> 17.0.2 compilers. Results on both machines are different (and presumably
>>>> wrong) from each other. I also compared results of the input file to
>>>> results obtained by an older versions (4.1 compiled with gcc on one
>>>> machine, 3.0 compiled with some intel compilers on the second machine;
>>>> these two installations gave same results). All energies except the self
>>>> energy is different:
>>>> "coorect"
>>>>
>>>> Overlap energy of the core charge distribution:
>>>> 0.00000310201993
>>>> Self energy of the core charge distribution:
>>>> -1007.31897988265303
>>>> Core Hamiltonian energy:
>>>> 295.26625363987614
>>>> Hartree energy:
>>>> 418.52562360415197
>>>> Exchange-correlation energy:
>>>> -101.48179826891138
>>>>
>>>> Total energy:
>>>> -395.00889780551631
>>>>
>>>> outer SCF iter = 1 RMS gradient = 0.00E+00 energy =
>>>> -395.0088978055
>>>> outer SCF loop converged in 1 iterations or 15 steps
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.):
>>>> -395.008897805517336
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> wrong output files are attached. I'm now trying to find out how to test
>>>> LIBINT, LIBXC, LIBXSMM and ELPA. Haven't had much luck yet.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for any suggestions.
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20180919/7ad3db85/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: err
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5444097 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20180919/7ad3db85/attachment.obj>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list