[CP2K-user] Two general questions about cell optimization in cp2k
Matthias Krack
matthia... at psi.ch
Fri Nov 16 14:28:17 UTC 2018
Dear Torstein
1) CP2K provides the &CELL_REF
<https://manual.cp2k.org/cp2k-6_1-branch/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/SUBSYS/CELL/CELL_REF.html>
section in the &CELL section which allows for the definition of a larger
reference cell. The reference cell can be 5-10% larger. This results
basically in a larger cutoff value employed by CP2K. So you can also
request just a larger cutoff (and no reference cell) like with VASP.
2) I select usually the pressure from experiment. There is nothing special
about the default value of 100 bar. The value for the pressure_tolerance
<https://manual.cp2k.org/cp2k-6_1-branch/CP2K_INPUT/MOTION/CELL_OPT.html#PRESSURE_TOLERANCE>
is more interesting for cell optimizations. I employ a pressure tolerance
of 10 bar with DFT usually.
HTH
Matthias
On Wednesday, 14 November 2018 15:31:23 UTC+1, Torstein Fjermestad wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have two general questions about optimization of cell parameters in cp2k.
>
> 1) How can the Pulay stress be reduced in an optimization of the cell
> parameters? In VASP, the recommendation is to increase the kinetic
> cut-off energy by approximately 1.5 times the default kinetic cut-off
> energy. Are there any similar guidelines for cp2k?
>
> 2) I see that the default value for the external pressure is set to 100
> bar. Why is this a reasonable default value? If we are comparing the
> computationally optimized cell parameters with the experimentally
> determined cell parameters, should we then change the value of the external
> pressure to the pressure for which the experiment was carried out?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Regards,
> Torstein
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20181116/76210c45/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list