[CP2K-user] [CP2K:10905] Ruthenium Basis Set

[Andres Ortega]

Dear Matthias, 

Thank you for your email, 

Yes I was reading and then I found a similar post of the same question for 
Fe basis set and pseudopotential.

best, 

Andres .
El martes, 6 de noviembre de 2018, 14:37:47 (UTC+1), Matthias Krack 
escribió:
>
> Dear Andres
>
>  
>
> A basis set should only be used with the pseudopotential for which it was 
> optimised. An invalid combination of pseudopotential and basis set will be 
> at best computationally inefficient and in most cases it will produce 
> unreliable or even wrong results.
>
>  
>
> HTH
>
>  
>
> Matthias
>
>  
>
> *From:* cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:> <cp... at googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:>> *On Behalf Of *Andres Ortega
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 6. November 2018 11:37
> *To:* cp2k <cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>>
> *Subject:* [CP2K:10905] Ruthenium Basis Set
>
>  
>
> Dear CP2K users, 
>
>  
>
> I was wondering if you could help me with something. 
>
>  
>
> I am working with a system that contains Ru(III) atoms. 
>
> For this, I have been using TZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH basis set, and I have used 
> a Potential with 8 charges (q8)
>
> I noticed that the basis set is from q16 instead of q8. 
>
>  
>
> Is it possible to use the TZVP with a potential of q8 for the valence or 
> instead should I used the q16?
>
>  
>
>  
>
> best, 
>
>  
>
> Andres Ortega. 
>
> LSMO EPFL
>
>  
>
>  
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20181106/73110e66/attachment.htm>