[CP2K-user] [CP2K:11058] Generate the GTH pseudopotential by ATOM

hut... at chem.uzh.ch hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Wed Dec 19 08:45:30 UTC 2018


Hi

as I said in the last comment - it is an art - to choose the
best parameter. You need some experience to get "optimal"
performance/convergence. 
I usually play with these parameters

     STEP_SIZE  0.08 
     MAX_INIT   50 
     MAX_FUN    250 
     STEP_SIZE_SCALING  0.90 

Start with large STEP_SIZE (0.1) and small MAX_FUN (50-100)
and end with small STEP_SIZE (0.00001) and large MAX_FUN(5000).

regards

Juerg Hutter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter                         Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C                FAX   : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich                   E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------

-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: "cp2k" <cp... at googlegroups.com>
From: ningz... at gmail.com
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 12/18/2018 08:15PM
Subject: Re: [CP2K:11058] Generate the GTH pseudopotential by ATOM

Hi Hutter,
  I find I need to restart the optimization for many times. It always needs 5000 restarting calculations using previous step GTH parameters. This process is so slow. How can I speed up this process?
  With my best regards,
  Zhi

在 2018年12月12日星期三 UTC-8下午11:56:59,jgh写道:Hi 
 
for many atoms you have to restart the optimization frequently 
until you reach sufficient convergence.  
For the restart you copy the GTH-PARAMETER to your input. 
Optimization is a kind of art. Choosing the parameter in the  
POWELL section is important for good performance. Still, it takes 
me often several 10'000 steps to reach reasonable results. 
 
regards 
 
Juerg Hutter 
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
Juerg Hutter                         Phone : ++41 44 635 4491 
Institut für Chemie C                FAX   : ++41 44 635 6838 
Universität Zürich                   E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch 
Winterthurerstrasse 190 
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland 
--------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: ----- 
To: "cp2k" <cp... at googlegroups.com> 
From: ning... at gmail.com 
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com 
Date: 12/12/2018 06:39PM 
Subject: Re: [CP2K:11046] Generate the GTH pseudopotential by ATOM 
 
Hi Hutter, 
  Thank you! I use your input file to generate the pseudopotential of Ti and I can reproduce your result. But I still have a question, the initial guess is nearly same with the final optimized pseudopotential. How can we get the better initial guess? These parameters include the R^cut and coefficients in non-local part and R^cut for each channel and h^ij coefficients in the local part. 
  With my best regards, 
  Zhi 
 
在 2018年12月12日星期三 UTC-8上午12:08:27,jgh写道:Hi  
  
the optimization of GTH pseudos is not unique. Depending on your  
object function, starting point and convergence you can get rather  
different results. The performance of all these different pseudos  
should be rather similar though.  
There are also elements that can be tricky to get and many repeated  
optimizations and some 'magic' is needed to get good results.  
  
This is a generic input I am currently using to optimize potentials:  
  
&GLOBAL  
  PROGRAM_NAME ATOM  
&END GLOBAL  
&ATOM  
  ELEMENT Ti  
  
  RUN_TYPE PSEUDOPOTENTIAL_OPTIMIZATION  
  
  ELECTRON_CONFIGURATION  [Ne] 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d2  
  CORE [Ne]  
  MAX_ANGULAR_MOMENTUM 3  
  
  &METHOD  
     METHOD_TYPE  KOHN-SHAM  
     RELATIVISTIC DKH(3)  
     &XC  
       &XC_FUNCTIONAL  
         &LIBXC  
          FUNCTIONAL MGGA_X_SCAN  
         &END LIBXC  
         &LIBXC  
           FUNCTIONAL MGGA_C_SCAN  
         &END LIBXC  
       &END XC_FUNCTIONAL  
     &END XC  
  &END METHOD  
  &OPTIMIZATION  
    EPS_SCF 1.e-7  
  &END  
  &AE_BASIS  
     BASIS_TYPE GEOMETRICAL_GTO  
  &END AE_BASIS  
  &PP_BASIS  
     BASIS_TYPE GEOMETRICAL_GTO  
  &END PP_BASIS  
  &POTENTIAL  
    PSEUDO_TYPE GTH  
    &GTH_POTENTIAL  
    4    6    2    0  
    0.38300965389957       2    8.69526962380773   -0.69130398136282  
       3  
    0.32535306838298       2    2.49370385691556    3.69297179681161  
                                                   -4.49419494638446  
    0.25460783706014       2   -4.62952832752021    8.87087769105041  
                                                  -10.49552627066998  
    0.24470423408872       1   -9.41064468800323  
    &END  
    CONFINEMENT_TYPE  BARRIER  
    CONFINEMENT 200. 4.0 12.0  
  &END POTENTIAL  
  
  &POWELL  
     ACCURACY   1.e-14  
     STEP_SIZE  0.08  
     MAX_INIT   50  
     MAX_FUN    250  
     STEP_SIZE_SCALING  0.90  
     WEIGHT_PSIR0 0.0  
     TARGET_POT_SEMICORE      [eV]      0.003000  
     TARGET_POT_VALENCE       [eV]      0.000300  
     TARGET_POT_VIRTUAL       [eV]      0.003000  
     WEIGHT_POT_NODE                   10.0  
     WEIGHT_POT_SEMICORE                2.0  
     WEIGHT_POT_VALENCE                 5.0  
     WEIGHT_POT_VIRTUAL                 1.0  
  &END  
&END ATOM  
  
You can find my recent optimized potentials for PBE, PBE0, SCAN, HF  
at my github repo (absolutely no warrenty!)  
  
https://github.com/juerghutter/GTH  
  
regards  
  
Juerg Hutter  
--------------------------------------------------------------  
Juerg Hutter                         Phone : ++41 44 635 4491  
Institut für Chemie C                FAX   : ++41 44 635 6838  
Universität Zürich                   E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch  
Winterthurerstrasse 190  
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland  
---------------------------------------------------------------  
  
-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----  
To: "cp2k" <cp... at googlegroups.com>  
From: ning... at gmail.com  
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com  
Date: 12/12/2018 02:19AM  
Subject: [CP2K:11041] Generate the GTH pseudopotential by ATOM  
  
Hello,  
  I need to generate the GTH pseudopotential and hope to use ATOM code in CP2K. But I find it is a little hard for me. The only thing I can do is just changing the initial guess of pseudopotential parameters. But there are so many parameters in GTH pseudopotential. The optimized pseudopotential changes slightly compared with initial guess. Can anyone tell me how to generate the GTH pseudopotential correctly by ATOM? I will be very appreciated!  
  Best regards,  
  Zhi    
  --   
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.  
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com.  
 To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.  
 Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.  
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.  
   
   
  --  
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group. 
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com. 
 To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com. 
 Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k. 
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
  
  
  -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




More information about the CP2K-user mailing list