[CP2K:9588] KEEP_ANGLES not possible in CELL_OPT using BFGS
Tobias Binninger
t... at zurich.ibm.com
Thu Oct 26 08:06:33 UTC 2017
Hi Matthias,
I am using CP2k version 4.1.
Here is an example input showing the problem:
&GLOBAL
PROJECT SnO2
RUN_TYPE CELL_OPT
PRINT_LEVEL LOW
&END GLOBAL
&FORCE_EVAL
METHOD QS
STRESS_TENSOR ANALYTICAL
&SUBSYS
&CELL
ABC 5.0 5.1 3.3
MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL 3 3 4
&END CELL
&TOPOLOGY
COORD_FILE_FORMAT XYZ
COORD_FILE_NAME ATOM_POSITIONS_INPUT
MULTIPLE_UNIT_CELL 3 3 4
&END TOPOLOGY
&KIND Sn
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q4
&END KIND
&KIND O
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q6
&END KIND
&END SUBSYS
&DFT
BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME BASIS_MOLOPT
POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME GTH_POTENTIALS
SPIN_POLARIZED T
MULTIPLICITY 1
&QS
EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-8
METHOD GAPW
&END QS
&MGRID
NGRIDS 5
CUTOFF 800
REL_CUTOFF 60
&END MGRID
&SCF
SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
EPS_SCF 1.0E-06
MAX_SCF 1000
&OT
ALGORITHM IRAC
ENERGY_GAP 0.001
PRECONDITIONER FULL_ALL
&END OT
&END SCF
&XC
&XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&END XC
&END DFT
&END FORCE_EVAL
&MOTION
&CELL_OPT
TYPE GEO_OPT
MAX_DR 1.0E-03
MAX_FORCE 1.0E-03
RMS_DR 1.0E-03
RMS_FORCE 1.0E-03
MAX_ITER 200
KEEP_ANGLES T
OPTIMIZER BFGS
&END CELL_OPT
&GEO_OPT
TYPE MINIMIZATION
MAX_DR 1.0E-03
MAX_FORCE 1.0E-03
RMS_DR 1.0E-03
RMS_FORCE 1.0E-03
MAX_ITER 200
OPTIMIZER BFGS
&END GEO_OPT
&CONSTRAINT
&FIXED_ATOMS
COMPONENTS_TO_FIX XYZ
LIST 1
&END FIXED_ATOMS
&END CONSTRAINT
&END MOTION
This is the first part of the output, showing that the angles already
change in the first step:
*******************************************************************************
*** STARTING CELL
OPTIMIZATION ***
***
BFGS ***
*******************************************************************************
CELL| Volume [angstrom^3]:
3029.400
CELL| Vector a [angstrom]: 15.000 0.000 0.000 |a| =
15.000
CELL| Vector b [angstrom]: 0.000 15.300 0.000 |b| =
15.300
CELL| Vector c [angstrom]: 0.000 0.000 13.200 |c| =
13.200
CELL| Angle (b,c), alpha [degree]:
90.000
CELL| Angle (a,c), beta [degree]:
90.000
CELL| Angle (a,b), gamma [degree]:
90.000
CELL| Numerically
orthorhombic: YES
-------- Informations at step = 0 ------------
Optimization Method = BFGS
Total Energy = -2561.1655488258
Internal Pressure [bar] = -94313.1351913527
Used time = 4260.816
---------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
OPTIMIZATION STEP: 1
--------------------------
Step is scaled; Scaling factor = 0.58939
CELL| Volume [angstrom^3]:
2942.352
CELL| Vector a [angstrom]: 14.928 0.000 0.000 |a| =
14.928
CELL| Vector b [angstrom]: 0.000 15.220 0.000 |b| =
15.220
CELL| Vector c [angstrom]: 0.002 0.002 12.950 |c| =
12.950
CELL| Angle (b,c), alpha [degree]:
89.993
CELL| Angle (a,c), beta [degree]:
89.993
CELL| Angle (a,b), gamma [degree]:
90.000
CELL| Numerically
orthorhombic: NO
Best regards,
Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20171026/3744a77b/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list